BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9734620)

  • 1. Cyclosporine microemulsion increases drug exposure and reduces acute rejection without incremental toxicity in de novo renal transplantation. International Sandimmun Neoral Study Group.
    Keown P; Niese D
    Kidney Int; 1998 Sep; 54(3):938-44. PubMed ID: 9734620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of microemulsion and conventional formulations of cyclosporine A in preventing acute rejection in de novo kidney transplant patients. The U.K. Neoral Renal Study Group.
    Pollard SG; Lear PA; Ready AR; Moore RH; Johnson RW
    Transplantation; 1999 Nov; 68(9):1325-31. PubMed ID: 10573071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized trial of cyclosporine microemulsion (neoral) versus conventional cyclosporine in liver transplantation: MILTON study. Multicentre International Study in Liver Transplantation of Neoral.
    Otto MG; Mayer AD; Clavien PA; Cavallari A; Gunawardena KA; Mueller EA
    Transplantation; 1998 Dec; 66(12):1632-40. PubMed ID: 9884251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Absorption profiling of cyclosporine microemulsion (neoral) during the first 2 weeks after renal transplantation.
    Canadian Neoral Renal Transplantation Study Group
    Transplantation; 2001 Sep; 72(6):1024-32. PubMed ID: 11579295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of two different cyclosporine formulations on the long-term progression to chronic rejection in renal allograft recipients.
    Goel M; Flechner SM; Ischikawa A; Induhara R; Mastroianni B; Savas K; Modlin C; Goldfarb D; Feng J; Cook DJ; Novick AC
    Clin Transplant; 2002 Dec; 16(6):442-9. PubMed ID: 12437625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized, double-blind, one-year study of the safety and tolerability of cyclosporine microemulsion compared with conventional cyclosporine in renal transplant patients. International Sandimmun Neoral Study Group.
    Frei UA; Neumayer HH; Buchholz B; Niese D; Mueller EA
    Transplantation; 1998 Jun; 65(11):1455-60. PubMed ID: 9645802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A comparative randomized prospective multicenter study of Sandimmune vs Neoral in liver transplantation].
    Roy A; Grant DR; Kneteman NM; Tchervenkov JI; Levy GA; Tan A; Hendricks L
    Ann Chir; 1998; 52(8):716-21. PubMed ID: 9846420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neoral compared to Sandimmune is associated with a decrease in histologic severity of rejection in patients undergoing primary liver transplantation.
    Graziadei IW; Wiesner RH; Marotta PJ; Porayko MK; Dahlke LJ; Wilson SM; Steers JL; Krom RA
    Transplantation; 1997 Sep; 64(5):726-31. PubMed ID: 9311710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to convert from traditional cyclosporine to the microemulsion formulation in stable renal transplant patients?
    Gaspari F; Perico N; Pisoni R; Anedda MF; Signorini O; Caruso R; Gotti E; Remuzzi G
    Clin Transplant; 1998 Oct; 12(5):379-90. PubMed ID: 9787945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. NOF-11: a one-year pediatric randomized double-blind comparison of neoral versus sandimmune in orthotopic liver transplantation.
    Alvarez F; Atkison PR; Grant DR; Guilbault N; Jones AB; Kim PS; Kneteman NM; Laurin L; Martin SR; Murphy GF; Paradis K; Shapiro J; Smith LJ; Superina RA
    Transplantation; 2000 Jan; 69(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 10653385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence for earlier stabilization of cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in de novo renal transplant patients receiving a microemulsion formulation.
    Kovarik JM; Mueller EA; Richard F; Niese D; Halloran PF; Jeffery J; Paul LC; Keown PA
    Transplantation; 1996 Sep; 62(6):759-63. PubMed ID: 8824473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized, prospective multicenter pharmacoepidemiologic study of cyclosporine microemulsion in stable renal graft recipients. Report of the Canadian Neoral Renal Transplantation Study Group.
    Keown P; Landsberg D; Halloran P; Shoker A; Rush D; Jeffery J; Russell D; Stiller C; Muirhead N; Cole E; Paul L; Zaltzman J; Loertscher R; Daloze P; Dandavino R; Boucher A; Handa P; Lawen J; Belitsky P; Parfrey P
    Transplantation; 1996 Dec; 62(12):1744-52. PubMed ID: 8990355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cyclosporin A (Neoral) in pediatric organ transplantation. Neoral Pediatric Study Group.
    Hoyer PF
    Pediatr Transplant; 1998 Feb; 2(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 10084758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety and tolerability of a new oral formulation of cyclosporin A, Sandimmun Neoral, in renal transplant patients.
    Taesch S; Niese D
    Transpl Int; 1994; 7 Suppl 1():S263-6. PubMed ID: 11271220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Effect of diltiazem on concentration of cyclosporin metabolites in Sandimmune and Neoral treated kidney transplant patients].
    Sperschneider H; Wagner C; Korn A; Christians U
    Med Klin (Munich); 1997 Oct; 92(10):589-96. PubMed ID: 9446006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) absorption profiling and sparse-sample predictors during the first 3 months after renal transplantation.
    International Neoral Renal Transplantation Study Group.
    Am J Transplant; 2002 Feb; 2(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 12099517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conversion of psoriasis patients from the conventional formulation of cyclosporin A to a new microemulsion formulation: a randomized, open, multicentre assessment of safety and tolerability.
    Zachariae H; Abrams B; Bleehen SS; Bräutigam M; Burrows D; Ettelt MJ; Fry L; Happle R; Haustein UF; Ganslandt J; Jung EG; Knop J; Kühne KH; Mellein B; Mørk NJ; Rogers S; Schmidt AG; Schopf RE; Sumner M; Taube KM; Weidinger G; Wurdel C; Zahn E
    Dermatology; 1998; 196(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 9568413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Safety and efficacy of generic cyclosporine arpimune in Filipino low-risk primary kidney transplant recipients.
    Pamugas GE; Danguilan RA; Lamban AB; Mangati VB; Ona ET
    Transplant Proc; 2012 Jan; 44(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 22310590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomized, trough blood cyclosporine concentration-controlled trial to compare the pharmacodynamics of Sandimmune and Neoral in de novo lung transplant recipients.
    Trull A; Steel L; Sharples L; Stewart S; Parameshwar J; McNeil K; Wallwork J
    Ther Drug Monit; 1999 Feb; 21(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 10051050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) in de novo and stable renal transplantation: clinical impact, pharmacokinetic consequences and economic benefits. Canadian and International Neoral Study Groups.
    Keown PA
    Transplant Proc; 1996 Aug; 28(4):2147-50. PubMed ID: 8769183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.