226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9734664)
1. Mobilizing peripheral blood stem cells with high-dose G-CSF alone is as effective as with Dexa-BEAM plus G-CSF in lymphoma patients.
Kröger N; Zeller W; Fehse N; Hassan HT; Krüger W; Gutensohn K; Lölliger C; Zander AR
Br J Haematol; 1998 Sep; 102(4):1101-6. PubMed ID: 9734664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combination chemotherapy with mitoguazon, ifosfamide, MTX, etoposide (MIME) and G-CSF can efficiently mobilize PBPC in patients with Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Aurlien E; Holte H; Pharo A; Kvaløy S; Jakobsen E; Smeland EB; Kvalheim G
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1998 May; 21(9):873-8. PubMed ID: 9613778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Autologous progenitor cell transplantation: prior exposure to stem cell-toxic drugs determines yield and engraftment of peripheral blood progenitor cell but not of bone marrow grafts.
Dreger P; Klöss M; Petersen B; Haferlach T; Löffler H; Loeffler M; Schmitz N
Blood; 1995 Nov; 86(10):3970-8. PubMed ID: 7579368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effective mobilisation of peripheral blood progenitor cells with 'Dexa-BEAM' and G-CSF: timing of harvesting and composition of the leukapheresis product.
Dreger P; Marquardt P; Haferlach T; Jacobs S; Mülverstedt T; Eckstein V; Suttorp M; Löffler H; Müller-Ruchholtz W; Schmitz N
Br J Cancer; 1993 Nov; 68(5):950-7. PubMed ID: 7692921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recombinant human granulocyte and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF and GM-CSF) administered following cytotoxic chemotherapy have a similar ability to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells.
Hohaus S; Martin H; Wassmann B; Egerer G; Haus U; Färber L; Burger KJ; Goldschmidt H; Hoelzer D; Haas R
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1998 Oct; 22(7):625-30. PubMed ID: 9818688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization with Dexa-Beam/G-CSF, ether lipid purging, and autologous transplantation after high-dose CBV treatment: a safe and effective regimen in patients with poor risk malignant lymphomas.
Knauf WU; Koenigsmann MP; Notter M; Hoppe B; Reufi B; Oberberg D; Thiel E; Berdel WE
Leuk Lymphoma; 1996 Oct; 23(3-4):305-11. PubMed ID: 9031111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor following peripheral-blood progenitor-cell transplant in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Cortelazzo S; Viero P; Bellavita P; Rossi A; Buelli M; Borleri GM; Marziali S; Bassan R; Comotti B; Rambaldi A
J Clin Oncol; 1995 Apr; 13(4):935-41. PubMed ID: 7535843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation between granulocyte/macrophage-colony-forming units and CD34+ cells in apheresis products from patients treated with different chemotherapy regimens and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells.
Vogel W; Kunert C; Blumenstengel K; Fricke HJ; Kath R; Sayer HG; Höffken K
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 1998; 124(6):341-5. PubMed ID: 9692843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: a randomized comparison of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim.
Weaver CH; Schulman KA; Buckner CD
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2001 May; 27 Suppl 2():S23-9. PubMed ID: 11436117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond CD34+ cell dose: impact of method of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization (granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], G-CSF plus plerixafor, or cyclophosphamide G-CSF/granulocyte-macrophage [GM]-CSF) on number of colony-forming unit-GM, engraftment, and Day +100 hematopoietic graft function.
Alexander ET; Towery JA; Miller AN; Kramer C; Hogan KR; Squires JE; Stuart RK; Costa LJ
Transfusion; 2011 Sep; 51(9):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 21392017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CD34+ dose-driven administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after high-dose chemotherapy in lymphoma patients.
Todisco E; Castagna L; Sarina B; Mazza R; Magagnoli M; Balzarotti M; Nozza A; Siracusano L; Timofeeva I; Anastasia A; Demarco M; Santoro A
Eur J Haematol; 2007 Feb; 78(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 17313558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficient peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with low-dose G-CSF (50 microg/m2) after salvage chemotherapy for lymphoma.
Martínez C; Sureda A; Martino R; Cancelas JA; Madoz P; García J; Brunet S
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1997 Nov; 20(10):855-8. PubMed ID: 9404926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dexamethasone, carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (dexa-BEAM) followed by high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell rescue--a highly effective regimen for patients with refractory or relapsed indolent lymphoma.
Josting A; Reiser M; Wickramanayake PD; Rueffer U; Draube A; Söhngen D; Tesch H; Wolf J; Diehl V; Engert A
Leuk Lymphoma; 2000 Mar; 37(1-2):115-23. PubMed ID: 10721775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stem cell mobilization with G-CSF alone in breast cancer patients: higher progenitor cell yield by delivering divided doses (2 x 5 microg/kg) compared to a single dose (1 x 10 microg/kg).
Kröger N; Zeller W; Hassan HT; Krüger W; Gutensohn K; Löliger C; Zander AR
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Jan; 23(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 10197796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A mononuclear cell dose of 3 x 10(8)/kg predicts early multilineage recovery in patients with malignant lymphoma treated with carmustine, etoposide, Ara-C and melphalan (BEAM) and peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation.
Smith RJ; Sweetenham JW
Exp Hematol; 1995 Dec; 23(14):1581-8. PubMed ID: 8542950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Successful mobilization of peripheral blood HPCs with G-CSF alone in patients failing to achieve sufficient numbers of CD34+ cells and/or CFU-GM with chemotherapy and G-CSF.
Fraipont V; Sautois B; Baudoux E; Pereira M; Fassotte MF; Hermanne JP; Jérusalem G; Longrée L; Schaaf-Lafontaine N; Fillet G; Beguin Y
Transfusion; 2000 Mar; 40(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 10738037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ESHAP plus G-CSF as an effective peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization regimen in pretreated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: comparison with high-dose cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF.
Lee JL; Kim S; Kim SW; Kim EK; Kim SB; Kang YK; Lee J; Kim MW; Park CJ; Chi HS; Huh J; Kim SH; Suh C
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2005 Mar; 35(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 15654353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Successful mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in heavily pretreated myeloma patients with G-CSF alone.
Kröger N; Zeller W; Hassan HT; Krüger W; Renges H; Hummel K; Gutensohn K; Lölliger C; Zander AR
Ann Hematol; 1998 Jun; 76(6):257-62. PubMed ID: 9692813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.
Arora M; Burns LJ; Barker JN; Miller JS; Defor TE; Olujohungbe AB; Weisdorf DJ
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2004 Jun; 10(6):395-404. PubMed ID: 15148493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of chemotherapy regimen and hematopoietic growth factor on mobilization and collection of peripheral blood stem cells in cancer patients.
Nowrousian MR; Waschke S; Bojko P; Welt A; Schuett P; Ebeling P; Flasshove M; Moritz T; Schuette J; Seeber S
Ann Oncol; 2003; 14 Suppl 1():i29-36. PubMed ID: 12736228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
