188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9734807)
1. The repeatability of automated and clinician refraction.
Bullimore MA; Fusaro RE; Adams CW
Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Aug; 75(8):617-22. PubMed ID: 9734807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of an automated subjective refractor.
Sheedy J; Schanz P; Bullimore M
Optom Vis Sci; 2004 May; 81(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 15181358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Subjective refraction using power vectors by updating a conventional phoropter with a Stokes lens for continuous astigmatic power generation.
Moreno JRA; Micó V; Albarrán Diego C
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2023 Sep; 43(5):1029-1039. PubMed ID: 37264763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of spherical equivalent refraction and astigmatism measured with three different models of autorefractors.
Gwiazda J; Weber C
Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jan; 81(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 14747762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of the Topcon BV-1000 automated subjective refraction system.
Dave T; Fukuma Y
Optom Vis Sci; 2004 May; 81(5):323-33. PubMed ID: 15181357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Self-assessment of refractive errors using a simple optical approach.
Leube A; Kraft C; Ohlendorf A; Wahl S
Clin Exp Optom; 2018 May; 101(3):386-391. PubMed ID: 29356102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeatability and reproducibility of manifest refraction.
Taneri S; Arba-Mosquera S; Rost A; Kießler S; Dick HB
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Dec; 46(12):1659-1666. PubMed ID: 33259390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of an automated subjective refraction method implemented in a computer-controlled motorized phoropter.
Otero C; Aldaba M; Pujol J
J Optom; 2019; 12(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 30389250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of an automated refractor using a Hartmann-Shack sensor after corneal refractive surgery and cataract surgery.
Park JH; Kim MJ; Park JH; Song IS; Kim JY; Tchah H
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1889-97. PubMed ID: 26603398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability and reproducibility of a handheld videorefractor.
Ogbuehi KC; Almaliki WH; AlQarni A; Osuagwu UL
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):632-41. PubMed ID: 25822015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An alternative clinical routine for subjective refraction based on power vectors with trial frames.
María Revert A; Conversa MA; Albarrán Diego C; Micó V
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 28030877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy, repeatability, and clinical application of spherocylindrical automated refraction using time-based wavefront aberrometry measurements.
Nissman SA; Tractenberg RE; Saba CM; Douglas JC; Lustbader JM
Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):577.e1-2. PubMed ID: 16527354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility of manifest refraction between surgeons and optometrists in a clinical refractive surgery practice.
Reinstein DZ; Yap TE; Carp GI; Archer TJ; Gobbe M;
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Mar; 40(3):450-9. PubMed ID: 24581774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Peripheral refraction in high myopia with spherical soft contact lenses.
Kwok E; Patel B; Backhouse S; Phillips JR
Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Mar; 89(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 22282223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Agreement Between Autorefraction and Subjective Refraction in Keraring-Implanted Keratoconic Eyes.
Al-Tuwairqi WS; Ogbuehi KC; Razzouk H; Alanazi MA; Osuagwu UL
Eye Contact Lens; 2017 Mar; 43(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 26825280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. COMPARISON OF SMARTPHONE-BASED AND AUTOMATED REFRACTION WITH SUBJECTIVE REFRACTION FOR SCREENING OF REFRACTIVE ERRORS.
Ee CL; Samsudin A
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2022 Oct; 29(5):588-594. PubMed ID: 34620023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experimental investigation of accommodation in eyes fit with multifocal contact lenses using a clinical auto-refractor.
Altoaimi BH; Kollbaum P; Meyer D; Bradley A
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Mar; 38(2):152-163. PubMed ID: 29315718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of autorefraction after cataract surgery with multifocal ReZoom intraocular lens implantation.
Muñoz G; Albarrán-Diego C; Sakla HF
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1573-8. PubMed ID: 17720072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
