BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9734807)

  • 21. The Reliability and Acceptability of RDx-Based Tele-Controlled Subjective Refraction Compared with Traditional Subjective Refraction.
    Huang J; Li X; Yan T; Wen L; Pan L; Yang Z
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2022 Nov; 11(11):16. PubMed ID: 36394842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Peripheral refraction in myopia corrected with spectacles versus contact lenses.
    Backhouse S; Fox S; Ibrahim B; Phillips JR
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Jul; 32(4):294-303. PubMed ID: 22577970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ametropia detection using a novel, compact wavefront autorefractor.
    Hernández CS; Gil A; Zaytouny A; Casares I; Poderoso J; de Lara A; Wehse A; Dave SR; Lim D; Lage E; Alejandre-Alba N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Mar; 44(2):311-320. PubMed ID: 38084770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid?
    Kimura S; Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Autorefraction versus subjective refraction in a radially asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens.
    van der Linden JW; Vrijman V; Al-Saady R; van der Meulen IJ; Mourits MP; Lapid-Gortzak R
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 92(8):764-8. PubMed ID: 24767468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of the auto-refraction function of the Nidek OPD-Scan III.
    McGinnigle S; Naroo SA; Eperjesi F
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Mar; 97(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 24024877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of a Novel Binocular Refraction System with Standard Digital Phoropter Refraction.
    Bossie T; Reilly J; Vera-Diaz FA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2023 Jul; 100(7):451-458. PubMed ID: 37369097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of a traditional and wavefront autorefraction.
    Lebow KA; Campbell CE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1191-8. PubMed ID: 25198541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Repeatability of Aberrometry-Based Automated Subjective Refraction in Healthy and Keratoconus Subjects.
    Carracedo G; Carpena-Torres C; Pastrana C; Privado-Aroco A; Serramito M; Batres L
    J Ophthalmol; 2020; 2020():4831298. PubMed ID: 33489331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical Comparison of High-resolution and Standard Refractions and Prescriptions.
    Meyer D; Rickert M; Reed O; Joret P; Kollbaum P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2023 Nov; 100(11):751-760. PubMed ID: 37861987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy, speed and repeatability of the voice assisted subjective refractor (VASR).
    Kabat AG; Lievens CW; Newman CM; Weber J
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2019; 13():1807-1813. PubMed ID: 31571819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of refractive error measures by the IRX3 aberrometer and autorefraction.
    McCullough SJ; Little JA; Breslin KM; Saunders KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1183-90. PubMed ID: 25192432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR-360A in a randomized population-based screening study.
    Stoor K; Karvonen E; Liinamaa J; Saarela V
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 96(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 29193822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Incidence of refractive errors with corrective aids subsequent selection].
    Benes P; Synek S; Petrová S; Sokolová SJ; Forýtková L; Holoubková Z
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2012 Feb; 68(1):11-4, 16. PubMed ID: 22679692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Repeatability of refraction and corrected visual acuity in keratoconus. The CLEK Study Group. Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus.
    Davis LJ; Schechtman KB; Begley CG; Shin JA; Zadnik K
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Dec; 75(12):887-96. PubMed ID: 9875994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Repeatability and validity of Zywave aberrometer measurements.
    Hament WJ; Nabar VA; Nuijts RM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Dec; 28(12):2135-41. PubMed ID: 12498848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Retinoscopy/autorefraction: which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
    Jorge J; Queirós A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 15630406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the SVOne: A Handheld, Smartphone-Based Autorefractor.
    Ciuffreda KJ; Rosenfield M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1133-9. PubMed ID: 26540478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reproducibility of sphero-cylindrical prescriptions.
    MacKenzie GE
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Mar; 28(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 18339045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stability of refraction and visual acuity during 5 years in eyes with simple myopia. The PERK Study Group.
    Nizam A; Waring GO; Lynn MJ; Ward MA; Asbell PA; Balyeat HD; Cohen E; Culbertson W; Doughman DJ; Fecko P
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1992; 8(6):439-47. PubMed ID: 1493117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.