These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9735459)

  • 1. Advanced digital mammography.
    Schilling RB; Cox JD; Sharma SR
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):163-5. PubMed ID: 9735459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advanced digital mammography.
    Schilling RB; Cox JD; Sharma SR
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 Aug; 10(3 Suppl 1):133-5. PubMed ID: 9268858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis with a wide scan angle compared to full-field digital mammography for the detection and characterization of microcalcifications.
    Clauser P; Nagl G; Helbich TH; Pinker-Domenig K; Weber M; Kapetas P; Bernathova M; Baltzer PAT
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Dec; 85(12):2161-2168. PubMed ID: 27842661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations.
    Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
    Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 18096530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital mammography: effects of reduced radiation dose on diagnostic performance.
    Samei E; Saunders RS; Baker JA; Delong DM
    Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):396-404. PubMed ID: 17356178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of digital and conventional mammography: a ROC study of 270 mammograms.
    Nab HW; Karssemeijer N; Van Erning LJ; Hendriks JH
    Med Inform (Lond); 1992; 17(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 1405832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ATMTN: a telemammography network architecture.
    Sheybani EO; Sankar R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Dec; 49(12):1438-43. PubMed ID: 12542239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imaging With Synthesized 2D Mammography: Differences, Advantages, and Pitfalls Compared With Digital Mammography.
    Zuckerman SP; Maidment ADA; Weinstein SP; McDonald ES; Conant EF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jul; 209(1):222-229. PubMed ID: 28463546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [ROC analysis comparing screen film mammography and digital mammography].
    Gaspard-Bakhach S; Dilhuydy MH; Bonichon F; Barreau B; Henriques C; Maugey-Laulom B
    J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 81(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 10705143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consistency of lesion size in digital mammography.
    Clunie DA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):W257; author reply W258. PubMed ID: 20729426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelets.
    Wang TC; Karayiannis NB
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Aug; 17(4):498-509. PubMed ID: 9845306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Emerging technologies in breast cancer detection.
    Smith AP; Hall PA; Marcello DM
    Radiol Manage; 2004; 26(4):16-24; quiz 25-7. PubMed ID: 15377106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lesion size inaccuracies in digital mammography.
    Paquelet JR; Hendrick RE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):W115-8. PubMed ID: 20028882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Impact of digital mammography in the detection and management of microcalcifications].
    Mellado M; Osa AM; Murillo A; Bermejo R; Burguete A; Pons MJ; Erdozain N
    Radiologia; 2013; 55(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 22015223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Should breast imaging practices convert to digital mammography? A response from members of the DMIST Executive Committee.
    Pisano ED; Hendrick RE; Yaffe M; Conant EF; Gatsonis C
    Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 17885176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RADIATION DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY IN DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS.
    Alakhras MM; Mello-Thoms C; Bourne R; Rickard M; Diffey J; Brennan PC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Apr; 173(4):351-360. PubMed ID: 26895769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tests for breast cancer. Mammography is going digital. But is it better than film?
    Harv Health Lett; 2007 May; 32(7):4-5. PubMed ID: 17575613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammography with and without radiolucent positioning sheets: Comparison of projected breast area, pain experience, radiation dose and technical image quality.
    Timmers J; Voorde MT; Engen RE; Landsveld-Verhoeven Cv; Pijnappel R; Greve KD; Heeten GJ; Broeders MJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):1903-9. PubMed ID: 26272030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Staging of breast cancer and the advanced applications of digital mammogram: what the physician needs to know?
    Helal MH; Mansour SM; Zaglol M; Salaleldin LA; Nada OM; Haggag MA
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160717. PubMed ID: 28055247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Typetesting of physical characteristics of digital mammography systems: first experiences within the Flemish breast cancer screening programme.
    Thierens H; Bosmans H; Buls N; Bacher K; De Hauwere A; Jacobs J; Clerinx P
    JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 17696080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.