143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9735460)
1. Panoramic dental radiography using a charge-coupled device receptor.
Farman AG; Farman TT
J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):166-8. PubMed ID: 9735460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Charge-coupled device panoramic radiography: effect of beam energy on radiation exposure.
Farman TT; Farman AG; Kelly MS; Firriolo FJ; Yancey JM; Stewart AV
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jan; 27(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 9482021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical trial of panoramic dental radiography using a CCD receptor.
Farman TT; Farman AG
J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):169-71. PubMed ID: 9735461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Dose measurements comparing conventional and digital panoramic radiography].
Visser H; Hermann KP; Bredemeier S; Köhler B
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 Jul; 4(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 10994319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part II: Occupational exposure.
Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Debaveye D; Bogaerts R; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 15897285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Panoramic and cephalometric extraoral dental radiograph systems.
American Dental Association, Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment
J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Dec; 133(12):1696-7. PubMed ID: 12512672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: Patient exposure.
Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Debaveye D; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 15897284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiation doses of indirect and direct digital cephalometric radiography.
Gijbels F; Sanderink G; Wyatt J; Van Dam J; Nowak B; Jacobs R
Br Dent J; 2004 Aug; 197(3):149-52; discussion 140. PubMed ID: 15311250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The consistent image--how to improve the quality of dental radiographs: 2. The image receptor, processing and darkroom/film handling.
Carmichael F
Dent Update; 2006; 33(1):39-40, 42. PubMed ID: 16512097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The OP 100 Digipan: evaluation of the image layer, magnification factors, and dosimetry.
Farman TT; Kelly MS; Farman AG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Feb; 83(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 9117762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Temporomandibular joint pantomography using charge-coupled device, photostimulable phosphor, and film receptors: a comparison.
Farman TT; Farman AG
J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):9-13. PubMed ID: 10342155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determination of dose-area product from panoramic radiography using a pencil ionization chamber: normalized data for the estimation of patient effective and organ doses.
Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Neratzoulakis J; Gourtsoyiannis N
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):708-14. PubMed ID: 15124987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of image characteristics and convenience in panoramic radiography using charge-coupled device, storage phosphor, and film receptors.
Farman AG; Farman TT
J Digit Imaging; 2001 Jun; 14(2 Suppl 1):48-51. PubMed ID: 11442119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An update on dental imaging.
Whaites E; Brown J
Br Dent J; 1998 Aug; 185(4):166-72. PubMed ID: 9769550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determination of the resolution of a digital system for panoramic radiography based on CCD technology.
Mastoris M; Li G; Welander U; McDavid WD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Mar; 97(3):408-14. PubMed ID: 15024369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation between spatial resolution and ball distortion rate of panoramic radiography.
Yeom HG; Kim JE; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Jun; 20(1):68. PubMed ID: 32560631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of lead apron shielding on absorbed doses from panoramic radiography.
Rottke D; Grossekettler L; Sawada K; Poxleitner P; Schulze D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130302. PubMed ID: 24404601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of dose reduction on the detectability of standardized radiolucent lesions in digital panoramic radiography.
Dula K; Sanderink G; van der Stelt PF; Mini R; Buser D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Aug; 86(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 9720100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effective dosages for recording Veraviewepocs dental panoramic images: analog film, digital, and panoramic scout for CBCT.
Garcia Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Gründler K; Visser H; Hirsch E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 18602314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
