These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9735460)

  • 1. Panoramic dental radiography using a charge-coupled device receptor.
    Farman AG; Farman TT
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):166-8. PubMed ID: 9735460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Charge-coupled device panoramic radiography: effect of beam energy on radiation exposure.
    Farman TT; Farman AG; Kelly MS; Firriolo FJ; Yancey JM; Stewart AV
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jan; 27(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 9482021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical trial of panoramic dental radiography using a CCD receptor.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):169-71. PubMed ID: 9735461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Dose measurements comparing conventional and digital panoramic radiography].
    Visser H; Hermann KP; Bredemeier S; Köhler B
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 Jul; 4(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 10994319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
    Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part II: Occupational exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Debaveye D; Bogaerts R; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 15897285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Panoramic and cephalometric extraoral dental radiograph systems.
    American Dental Association, Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Dec; 133(12):1696-7. PubMed ID: 12512672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: Patient exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Debaveye D; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 15897284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation doses of indirect and direct digital cephalometric radiography.
    Gijbels F; Sanderink G; Wyatt J; Van Dam J; Nowak B; Jacobs R
    Br Dent J; 2004 Aug; 197(3):149-52; discussion 140. PubMed ID: 15311250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The consistent image--how to improve the quality of dental radiographs: 2. The image receptor, processing and darkroom/film handling.
    Carmichael F
    Dent Update; 2006; 33(1):39-40, 42. PubMed ID: 16512097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The OP 100 Digipan: evaluation of the image layer, magnification factors, and dosimetry.
    Farman TT; Kelly MS; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Feb; 83(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 9117762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporomandibular joint pantomography using charge-coupled device, photostimulable phosphor, and film receptors: a comparison.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):9-13. PubMed ID: 10342155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of dose-area product from panoramic radiography using a pencil ionization chamber: normalized data for the estimation of patient effective and organ doses.
    Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Neratzoulakis J; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):708-14. PubMed ID: 15124987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of image characteristics and convenience in panoramic radiography using charge-coupled device, storage phosphor, and film receptors.
    Farman AG; Farman TT
    J Digit Imaging; 2001 Jun; 14(2 Suppl 1):48-51. PubMed ID: 11442119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An update on dental imaging.
    Whaites E; Brown J
    Br Dent J; 1998 Aug; 185(4):166-72. PubMed ID: 9769550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of the resolution of a digital system for panoramic radiography based on CCD technology.
    Mastoris M; Li G; Welander U; McDavid WD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Mar; 97(3):408-14. PubMed ID: 15024369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation between spatial resolution and ball distortion rate of panoramic radiography.
    Yeom HG; Kim JE; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC
    BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Jun; 20(1):68. PubMed ID: 32560631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of dose reduction on the detectability of standardized radiolucent lesions in digital panoramic radiography.
    Dula K; Sanderink G; van der Stelt PF; Mini R; Buser D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Aug; 86(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 9720100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effective dosages for recording Veraviewepocs dental panoramic images: analog film, digital, and panoramic scout for CBCT.
    Garcia Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Gründler K; Visser H; Hirsch E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 18602314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
    Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.