These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9735814)
1. High Court endorses women's right to refuse treatment. Pract Midwife; 1998 Jun; 1(6):7. PubMed ID: 9735814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. When pregnant women and their physicians disagree on the need for cesarean section: no simple solution. Catlin AJ Adv Pract Nurs Q; 1998; 4(2):23-9. PubMed ID: 9874946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Compulsory caesareans: the last world? Dimond B Pract Midwife; 1998 Jun; 1(6):10-2. PubMed ID: 9735815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The right to say no. Ferguson P Nurs Times; 1998 Jun 10-16; 94(23):28-30. PubMed ID: 9687749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The right of refusal? Kargar I Nurs Times; 1992 Nov 4-10; 88(45):23. PubMed ID: 1437622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The right to choose. Savage W Nurs Stand; 1998 May 20-26; 12(35):14. PubMed ID: 9687689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Obstetricians, health attorneys, and court-ordered cesarean sections. Samuels TA; Minkoff H; Feldman J; Awonuga A; Wilson TE Womens Health Issues; 2007; 17(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 17403468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Whose body is it, anyway? Hewson B Nurs Stand; 1997 May; 11(35):18. PubMed ID: 9239007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Sheila Kitzinger's letter from Europe: court-ordered cesareans in the United Kingdom. Kitzinger S Birth; 1998 Sep; 25(3):202-3. PubMed ID: 9767224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. When "no" means no: elderly patients' right to refuse treatment. Plawecki LH; Amrhein DW J Gerontol Nurs; 2009 Aug; 35(8):16-8. PubMed ID: 19681558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What happened to the midwife in the case of the woman forced to have a caesarean. Cronk M Nurs Times; 1998 May 20-26; 94(20):18. PubMed ID: 9661457 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mother v. fetus--the case of "do or die": in re A.C. Snyder DB J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1989; 5():319-37. PubMed ID: 10293012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Can cesarean section be performed without the woman's consent? Lyng K; Syse A; Børdahl PE Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Jan; 84(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 15603565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Whose rights supersede, those of the patient or those of the unborn fetus? Cady RF JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul; 1999 Mar; 1(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 10823985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses. Warren MA Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Personal autonomy versus active management of labor. McLean MT Midwifery Today Childbirth Educ; 1994; (30):18. PubMed ID: 7920795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Worst case scenario. Supporting women who refuse a caesarean section. Lee G Pract Midwife; 1998; 1(7-8):28-9. PubMed ID: 10392145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Forced medical treatment in pregnancy: resolving the conflicting rights of mother and fetus. Meyer KC Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 10104769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The right of the patient to refuse medical care. Neoral L Acta Med Leg Soc (Liege); 1988; 38(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 2979490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]