151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9735925)
1. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol can be chemically measured: a new superior method.
Okada M; Matsui H; Ito Y; Fujiwara A; Inano K
J Lab Clin Med; 1998 Sep; 132(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 9735925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Friedewald-estimated versus directly measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and treatment implications.
Martin SS; Blaha MJ; Elshazly MB; Brinton EA; Toth PP; McEvoy JW; Joshi PH; Kulkarni KR; Mize PD; Kwiterovich PO; Defilippis AP; Blumenthal RS; Jones SR
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Aug; 62(8):732-9. PubMed ID: 23524048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fasting Versus Nonfasting and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Accuracy.
Sathiyakumar V; Park J; Golozar A; Lazo M; Quispe R; Guallar E; Blumenthal RS; Jones SR; Martin SS
Circulation; 2018 Jan; 137(1):10-19. PubMed ID: 29038168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analytical performance of a direct assay for LDL-cholesterol: a comparative assessment versus Friedewald's formula.
Türkalp I; Cil Z; Ozkazanç D
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2005 Mar; 5(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 15755695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Concentrations by Direct Measurement and by Friedewald Calculation.
Sung KC; Kwon CH; Lee MY; Kwon MJ; Lee JH; Jung MH; Shin JH
Am J Cardiol; 2020 Mar; 125(6):866-873. PubMed ID: 31928718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of an immunoprecipitation method for direct measurement of LDL-cholesterol with beta-quantification (ultracentrifugation).
Jialal I; Hirany SV; Devaraj S; Sherwood TA
Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Jul; 104(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 7611188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Underestimation of Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol With the Friedewald Equation Versus a Direct Homogenous Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol Assay.
Jialal I; Inn M; Siegel D; Devaraj S
Lab Med; 2017 Aug; 48(3):220-224. PubMed ID: 28398496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of low serum triglyceride on LDL-cholesterol estimation.
Ahmadi SA; Boroumand MA; Gohari-Moghaddam K; Tajik P; Dibaj SM
Arch Iran Med; 2008 May; 11(3):318-21. PubMed ID: 18426324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is the determination of LDL cholesterol according to Friedewald accurate in CAPD and HD patients?
Nauck M; Krämer-Guth A; Bartens W; März W; Wieland H; Wanner C
Clin Nephrol; 1996 Nov; 46(5):319-25. PubMed ID: 8953121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accurate direct determination of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol using an immunoseparation reagent and enzymatic cholesterol assay.
Pisani T; Gebski CP; Leary ET; Warnick GR; Ollington JF
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Dec; 119(12):1127-35. PubMed ID: 7503661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Calculated low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels frequently underestimate directly measured low density lipoprotein cholesterol determinations in patients with serum triglyceride levels < or =4.52 mmol/l: an analysis comparing the LipiDirect magnetic LDL assay with the Friedewald calculation.
Tighe DA; Ockene IS; Reed G; Nicolosi R
Clin Chim Acta; 2006 Mar; 365(1-2):236-42. PubMed ID: 16259972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the atherogenic burden of individuals with a Friedewald-estimated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dL compared with a novel low-density lipoprotein estimation method.
Whelton SP; Meeusen JW; Donato LJ; Jaffe AS; Saenger A; Sokoll LJ; Blumenthal RS; Jones SR; Martin SS
J Clin Lipidol; 2017; 11(4):1065-1072. PubMed ID: 28826567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The accuracy in using modified Friedewald equation to calculate LDL from non-fast triglyceride: a pilot study.
Puavilai W; Laorugpongse D; Deerochanawong C; Muthapongthavorn N; Srilert P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Feb; 92(2):182-7. PubMed ID: 19253792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lipoprotein-cholesterol analysis during screening: accuracy and reliability.
Bachorik PS; Cloey TA; Finney CA; Lowry DR; Becker DM
Ann Intern Med; 1991 May; 114(9):741-7. PubMed ID: 2012356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A more valid measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in diabetic patients.
Hirany S; Li D; Jialal I
Am J Med; 1997 Jan; 102(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 9209200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation and clinical application of a direct low-density lipoprotein cholesterol assay in normolipidemic and hyperlipidemic adults.
Yu HH; Ginsburg GS; Harris N; Rifai N
Am J Cardiol; 1997 Nov; 80(10):1295-9. PubMed ID: 9388101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of five methods for determining low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in hemodialysis patients(1).
Bairaktari E; Elisaf M; Tzallas C; Karabina SA; Tselepis AD; Siamopoulos KC; Tsolas O
Clin Biochem; 2001 Nov; 34(8):593-602. PubMed ID: 11849617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of the precision of the Friedewald's formula for the calculation of low density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration in serum].
Chotkowska E; Kurjata P; Kupść W
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2001 Oct; 11(64):348-51. PubMed ID: 11770317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Studies on the development of clinical laboratory tests by mathematical approaches: final lecture].
Okada M
Rinsho Byori; 2012 Jun; 60(6):536-41. PubMed ID: 22880231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rationale for use of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol rather than low-density lipoprotein cholesterol as a tool for lipoprotein cholesterol screening and assessment of risk and therapy.
Frost PH; Havel RJ
Am J Cardiol; 1998 Feb; 81(4A):26B-31B. PubMed ID: 9526810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
