These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Male circumcision and the enhancement debate: harm reduction, not prohibition. Savulescu J J Med Ethics; 2013 Jul; 39(7):416-7. PubMed ID: 23781077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Prospective randomized trial comparing dissection with Plastibell® circumcision. Bastos Netto JM; de Araújo JG; de Almeida Noronha MF; Passos BR; de Bessa J; Figueiredo AA J Pediatr Urol; 2010 Dec; 6(6):572-7. PubMed ID: 20153700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pain during Mogen or PlastiBell circumcision. Taeusch HW; Martinez AM; Partridge JC; Sniderman S; Armstrong-Wells J; Fuentes-Afflick E J Perinatol; 2002; 22(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 11948384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Para Phimosis Leading to Glans Gangrene - A Devastating Preventable Complication. Sokhal AK; Saini DK; Sankhwar S Balkan Med J; 2017 Apr; 34(2):180-181. PubMed ID: 28418348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of complications of circumcision by 'Plastibell device technique' in male neonates and infants. Moosa FA; Khan FW; Rao MH J Pak Med Assoc; 2010 Aug; 60(8):664-7. PubMed ID: 20726200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Amputations with use of adult-size scissors-type circumcision clamps on infants. Health Devices; 1995 Jul; 24(7):286-7. PubMed ID: 7591812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Complication of a circumcision performed with a plastic disposable circumision device: long-term follow-up. Johnsonbaugh RE Am J Dis Child; 1979 Apr; 133(4):438. PubMed ID: 433862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Newborn circumcision using the Plastibell device: an audit of practice. Duncan ND; Dundas SE; Brown B; Pinnock-Ramsaran C; Badal G West Indian Med J; 2004 Jan; 53(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 15114889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Circumcision mishaps in Nigerian children. Osifo OD; Oriaifo IA Ann Afr Med; 2009; 8(4):266-70. PubMed ID: 20139551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Postoperative necrotizing fasciitis: a rare and fatal complication]. Ghezala HB; Feriani N Pan Afr Med J; 2016; 23():123. PubMed ID: 27279950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reconstruction of the penis following necrosis from circumcision used high frequency cutting current. Stefan H Sb Ved Pr Lek Fak Karlovy Univerzity Hradci Kralove Suppl; 1992; 35(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 1344697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Improving outcome from Plastibell circumcisions in infants. Mahomed A; Zaparackaite I; Adam S Int Braz J Urol; 2009; 35(3):310-3; discussion 313-4. PubMed ID: 19538766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Amputation of the penis during traditional circumcision. Ameh EA; Sabo SY; Muhammad I Trop Doct; 1997 Apr; 27(2):117. PubMed ID: 9133807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Gangrene of the penis following circumcision with high frequency current; plastic reconstruction of the penis. HAMM WG; KANTHAK FF South Med J; 1949 Aug; 42(8):657-9. PubMed ID: 18147617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Glans and penile skin amputation as a complication of circumcision. Coŝkunfirat OK; Sayilkan S; Velidedeoglu H Ann Plast Surg; 1999 Oct; 43(4):457. PubMed ID: 10517480 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Plastibell template circumcision: a new technique. Peterson AC; Joyner BD; Allen RC Urology; 2001 Oct; 58(4):603-4. PubMed ID: 11597549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]