These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9741184)

  • 41. Radiation risks.
    Linton O
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Nov; 13(11):1445. PubMed ID: 17070465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
    Huda W
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Health outcomes of low-dose ionizing radiation exposure among medical workers: a cohort study of the Canadian national dose registry of radiation workers.
    Zielinski JM; Garner MJ; Band PR; Krewski D; Shilnikova NS; Jiang H; Ashmore PJ; Sont WN; Fair ME; Letourneau EG; Semenciw R
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2009; 22(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 19546093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Work environment and occupational risk assessment for small animal Portuguese veterinary activities.
    Macedo AC; Mota VT; Tavares JM; Machado OL; Malcata FX; Cristo MP; Mayan ON
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2018 Mar; 15(3):D19-D28. PubMed ID: 29157155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Radiation safety in the endoscopy setting. SGNA guideline.
    Kelsey L; Herron-Rice L; Anderson P; Friis CM; Gauthier P; Gondzur N; Girard D; Kraai C; Malone MA; Scroggs A;
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2008; 31(4):308-11. PubMed ID: 18708838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Radiation dose to PET technologists and strategies to lower occupational exposure.
    Roberts FO; Gunawardana DH; Pathmaraj K; Wallace A; U PL; Mi T; Berlangieri SU; O'Keefe GJ; Rowe CC; Scott AM
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2005 Mar; 33(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 15731021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comments on 'Increasing film-focus distance (FFD) reduces radiation dose for X-ray examinations' by P.C. Brennan, S. McDonnell and D. O'Leary.
    Huda W; Ogden KM; Brennan PC; O'Leary D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(4):453-5. PubMed ID: 15769801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Occupational exposure to ionising radiation in the region of Anatolia, Turkey for the period 1995-1999.
    Gündüz H; Zeyrek CT; Aksu L; Işak S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 108(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 15103059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Implications of ICRP 60 and the patient directive 97/43 Euratom for nuclear medicine.
    Bourguignon MH
    Q J Nucl Med; 2000 Dec; 44(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 11302257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Saving lives and changing family histories: appropriate counseling of pregnant women and men and women of reproductive age, concerning the risk of diagnostic radiation exposures during and before pregnancy.
    Brent RL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jan; 200(1):4-24. PubMed ID: 19121655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The imaging imperative meets concerns about radiation exposure.
    Hillman BJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 May; 4(5):265-6. PubMed ID: 17467605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Radiation exposure in the acute and short-term management of urolithiasis at 2 academic centers.
    Ferrandino MN; Bagrodia A; Pierre SA; Scales CD; Rampersaud E; Pearle MS; Preminger GM
    J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):668-72; discussion 673. PubMed ID: 19100573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Radiation hygiene evaluation of x-ray examinations].
    Stavitskiĭ RV; Dermendzhiev KhT; Dolmat ES
    Gig Sanit; 1973 Jun; 38(6):47-51. PubMed ID: 4762076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Radiation safety of the patients during x-ray diagnostic studies].
    Krongauz AN; Kazakova LN; Gorelova LN; Pavlova TG; Khomutova MG
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1974; (2):78-83. PubMed ID: 4830678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Which one is at risk in intraoperative fluoroscopy? Assistant surgeon or orthopaedic surgeon?
    Tasbas BA; Yagmurlu MF; Bayrakci K; Ucaner A; Heybeli M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Jun; 123(5):242-4. PubMed ID: 12740702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of occupational exposures to natural radiation in the Czech Republic.
    Neznal M; Zenatá I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 18407974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Fluoroscopically guided percutaneous vertebroplasty: assessment of radiation doses and implementation of procedural routines to reduce operator exposure.
    von Wrangel A; Cederblad A; Rodriguez-Catarino M
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Jun; 50(5):490-6. PubMed ID: 19363715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Secondary ionizing radiation generated by digital and analog coronary cineangiographic equipment: influence of external systems of radiologic protection].
    Ramírez A; Farias E; Silva AM; Oyarzún C; Leyton F; Ugalde H; Dussaillant G; Cumsille MA
    Rev Med Chil; 2000 Aug; 128(8):853-62. PubMed ID: 11129546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Regulatory aspects of radiation protection.
    Janssens A; Sarro Vaquero M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):18-22. PubMed ID: 16461539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Dose trends in occupational radiation exposure in Europe results from the ESOREX project.
    Frasch G; Petrová K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):121-6. PubMed ID: 17533160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.