These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Revision total knee arthroplasty with modular components inserted with metaphyseal cement and stems without cement. Peters CL; Erickson J; Kloepper RG; Mohr RA J Arthroplasty; 2005 Apr; 20(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 15809946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ten- to 12-year followup of the Insall-Burstein I total knee prosthesis. Thadani PJ; Vince KG; Ortaaslan SG; Blackburn DC; Cudiamat CV Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2000 Nov; (380):17-29. PubMed ID: 11064969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. LCS mobile-bearing total knee replacement. A 10-year's follow-up study. Vogt JC; Saarbach C Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 May; 95(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 19328763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. Meneghini RM; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jan; 90(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 18171960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Uncemented Tantalum Monoblock Tibial Fixation for Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 60 Years of Age: Mean 10-Year Follow-up. DeFrancesco CJ; Canseco JA; Nelson CL; Israelite CL; Kamath AF J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 May; 100(10):865-870. PubMed ID: 29762282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Bisurface total knee replacement: a unique design for flexion. Four-to-nine-year follow-up study. Akagi M; Nakamura T; Matsusue Y; Ueo T; Nishijyo K; Ohnishi E J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Nov; 82(11):1626-33. PubMed ID: 11097454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement. A nine to twelve-year follow-up study. Callaghan JJ; Squire MW; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Johnston RC J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 May; 82(5):705-11. PubMed ID: 10819281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of a constrained condylar knee prosthesis. Kim YH; Kim JS J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Jun; 91(6):1440-7. PubMed ID: 19487523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Progressive subluxation and polyethylene wear in total knee replacements with flat articular surfaces. Feng EL; Stulberg SD; Wixson RL Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Feb; (299):60-71. PubMed ID: 8119038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revision TKA with a condylar constrained prosthesis using metaphyseal and surface cementation: a minimum 6-year follow-up analysis. Sanz-Ruiz P; Villanueva-Martínez M; Matas-Diez JA; Vaquero-Martín J BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Feb; 16():39. PubMed ID: 25888058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Early failure of the porous coated anatomic cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Aids to diagnosis and revision. Knight JL; Atwater RD; Guo J J Arthroplasty; 1997 Jan; 12(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 9021496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reoperation after condylar revision total knee arthroplasty. Stuart MJ; Larson JE; Morrey BF Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Jan; (286):168-73. PubMed ID: 8425340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tibial polyethylene failure after primary porous-coated anatomic total knee arthroplasty. Aids to diagnosis and revision. Knight JL; Gorai PA; Atwater RD; Grothaus L J Arthroplasty; 1995 Dec; 10(6):748-57. PubMed ID: 8749756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]