These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9741852)

  • 1. Some new multiple-test procedures for dose finding.
    Dunnett CW; Tamhane AC
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 Jul; 8(3):353-66. PubMed ID: 9741852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple test procedures for dose finding.
    Tamhane AC; Hochberg Y; Dunnett CW
    Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 8934584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonparametric step-down test procedures for finding minimum effective dose.
    Sidik K; Morris RW
    J Biopharm Stat; 1999 May; 9(2):217-40. PubMed ID: 10379690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Step-down trend tests for identifying the minimum effective dose.
    Amaratunga D; Ge N
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 Mar; 8(1):151-62. PubMed ID: 9547433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A note on multiple testing procedures in dose finding.
    Bauer P
    Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):1125-8. PubMed ID: 9333343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consonant closed likelihood ratio test procedures with application to dose-response study.
    Wang B; Cui X
    Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(25):2617-30. PubMed ID: 20740552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A multiple comparison procedure to control the strong stagewise family error rate in comparing test treatments and a control.
    Chen M; Kianifard F
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Jul; 7(3):355-67. PubMed ID: 9252830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finding the maximum safe dose level for heteroscedastic data.
    Tamhane AC; Logan BR
    J Biopharm Stat; 2004 Nov; 14(4):843-56. PubMed ID: 15587967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A step-up test procedure to find the minimum effective dose.
    Wang W; Peng J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(3):525-38. PubMed ID: 24905396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple testing to establish superiority/equivalence of a new treatment compared with k standard treatments for unbalanced designs.
    Kwong KS; Cheung SH; Chan WS
    Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):491-8. PubMed ID: 15180675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Step-up multiple testing of parameters with unequally correlated estimates.
    Dunnett CW; Tamhane AC
    Biometrics; 1995 Mar; 51(1):217-27. PubMed ID: 7766777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Dunnett-Bonferroni-based parallel gatekeeping procedure for dose-response clinical trials with multiple endpoints.
    Xu H; Nuamah I; Liu J; Lim P; Sampson A
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(4):301-16. PubMed ID: 19065544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Closure procedures for monotone bi-factorial dose-response designs.
    Hellmich M; Lehmacher W
    Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):269-76. PubMed ID: 15737103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptive dose-finding: Proof of concept with type I error control.
    Miller F
    Biom J; 2010 Oct; 52(5):577-89. PubMed ID: 20976691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dunnett's many-to-one test and least square means.
    Shun Z; Silverberg A; Chang CK; Ouyang P
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Feb; 13(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 12635900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sequential method of estimating the LD50 using a modified up-and-down rule.
    Jung H; Choi SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 1994 Mar; 4(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 8019581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple testing. Part II. Step-down procedures for control of the family-wise error rate.
    van der Laan MJ; Dudoit S; Pollard KS
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article14. PubMed ID: 16646792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A multiple-step selection procedure with sequential protection of preferred treatments.
    Chen TT; Simon R
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):753-61. PubMed ID: 8241371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A permutational step-up method of testing multiple outcomes.
    Troendle JF
    Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):846-59. PubMed ID: 8805759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Procedures for two-sample comparisons with multiple endpoints controlling the experimentwise error rate.
    Lehmacher W; Wassmer G; Reitmeir P
    Biometrics; 1991 Jun; 47(2):511-21. PubMed ID: 1912258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.