These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9743320)

  • 1. Uncontrolled pearls, controlled evidence, meta-analysis and the individual patient.
    Ioannidis JP; Lau J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1998 Aug; 51(8):709-11. PubMed ID: 9743320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meta-analyses: what they can and cannot do.
    Nordmann AJ; Kasenda B; Briel M
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2012; 142():w13518. PubMed ID: 22407741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Network meta-analysis incorporating randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative cohort studies for assessing the safety and effectiveness of medical treatments: challenges and opportunities.
    Cameron C; Fireman B; Hutton B; Clifford T; Coyle D; Wells G; Dormuth CR; Platt R; Toh S
    Syst Rev; 2015 Nov; 4():147. PubMed ID: 26537988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough.
    Lau J; Ioannidis JP; Schmid CH
    Lancet; 1998 Jan; 351(9096):123-7. PubMed ID: 9439507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the impact of attrition in randomized controlled trials.
    Hewitt CE; Kumaravel B; Dumville JC; Torgerson DJ;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1264-70. PubMed ID: 20573482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deriving treatment recommendations from evidence within randomized trials. The role and limitation of meta-analysis.
    Freemantle N; Mason J; Eccles M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(2):304-15. PubMed ID: 10507190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.
    Green AK; Reeder-Hayes KE; Corty RW; Basch E; Milowsky MI; Dusetzina SB; Bennett AV; Wood WA
    Oncologist; 2015 May; 20(5):464-e20. PubMed ID: 25876994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A methodological review of recent meta-analyses has found significant heterogeneity in age between randomized groups.
    Clark L; Fairhurst C; Hewitt CE; Birks Y; Brabyn S; Cockayne S; Rodgers S; Hicks K; Hodgson R; Littlewood E; Torgerson DJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 67(9):1016-24. PubMed ID: 24909873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews.
    Lau J; Ioannidis JP; Schmid CH
    Ann Intern Med; 1997 Nov; 127(9):820-6. PubMed ID: 9382404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On ideals of objectivity, judgments, and bias in medical research - A comment on Stegenga.
    Jukola S
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2017 Apr; 62():35-41. PubMed ID: 28188111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reconciling disparate data to determine the right answer: A grounded theory of meta analysts' reasoning in meta-analysis.
    Chan L; Macdonald ME; Carnevale FA; Steele RJ; Shrier I
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):25-40. PubMed ID: 28741808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.
    Dechartres A; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Charles P; Ravaud P
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 21727292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Overcoming the limitations of current meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
    Pogue J; Yusuf S
    Lancet; 1998 Jan; 351(9095):47-52. PubMed ID: 9433436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploratory or analytic meta-analysis: should we distinguish between them?
    Anello C; Fleiss JL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):109-16; discussion 117-8. PubMed ID: 7853037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
    Tierney JF; Stewart LA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis.
    Rosenfeld RM
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2004; 66(4):186-95. PubMed ID: 15467343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Obtaining data from randomised controlled trials: how much do we need for reliable and informative meta-analyses?
    Clarke MJ; Stewart LA
    BMJ; 1994 Oct; 309(6960):1007-10. PubMed ID: 7950694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.