These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9744181)

  • 1. Differences in health estimates using telephone and door-to-door survey methods--a hypothetical exercise.
    Taylor AW; Wilson DH; Wakefield M
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 1998 Apr; 22(2):223-6. PubMed ID: 9744181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bias of health estimates obtained from chronic disease and risk factor surveillance systems using telephone population surveys in Australia: results from a representative face-to-face survey in Australia from 2010 to 2013.
    Dal Grande E; Chittleborough CR; Campostrini S; Taylor AW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Apr; 16():44. PubMed ID: 27089889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Random digit dialling and Electronic White Pages samples compared: demographic profiles and health estimates.
    Wilson DH; Starr GJ; Taylor AW; Dal Grande E
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 1999 Dec; 23(6):627-33. PubMed ID: 10641355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does sampling using random digit dialling really cost more than sampling from telephone directories: debunking the myths.
    Yang B; Eyeson-Annan M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Feb; 6():6. PubMed ID: 16504117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is there a difference in health estimates between people with listed and unlisted telephone numbers?
    Dal Grande E; Taylor A; Wilson D
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2005 Oct; 29(5):448-56. PubMed ID: 16255447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sampling and coverage issues of telephone surveys used for collecting health information in Australia: results from a face-to-face survey from 1999 to 2008.
    Dal Grande E; Taylor AW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Aug; 10():77. PubMed ID: 20738884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health Estimates Using Survey Raked-Weighting Techniques in an Australian Population Health Surveillance System.
    Dal Grande E; Chittleborough CR; Campostrini S; Tucker G; Taylor AW
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Sep; 182(6):544-56. PubMed ID: 26306665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-response to a life course socioeconomic position indicator in surveillance: comparison of telephone and face-to-face modes.
    Chittleborough CR; Taylor AW; Baum FE; Hiller JE
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Aug; 8():54. PubMed ID: 18700038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Random digit dialing and directory-based samples in telephone surveys of HIV risk: a comparison from the Australian Study of Health and Relationships.
    Smith AM; de Visser RO; Rissel CE
    Ann Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 15(3):232-5. PubMed ID: 15723770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adjustments for non-telephone bias in random-digit-dialling surveys.
    Frankel MR; Srinath KP; Hoaglin DC; Battaglia MP; Smith PJ; Wright RA; Khare M
    Stat Med; 2003 May; 22(9):1611-26. PubMed ID: 12704619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Face-to-face household interviews versus telephone interviews for health surveys.
    Donovan RJ; Holman CD; Corti B; Jalleh G
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 1997 Apr; 21(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 9161067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selection bias from sampling frames: telephone directory and electoral roll compared with door-to-door population census: results from the Blue Mountains Eye Study.
    Smith W; Mitchell P; Attebo K; Leeder S
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 1997 Apr; 21(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 9161066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity of data collected by telephone survey: a comparison of VIGITEL 2008 and 'Saúde em Beagá' survey.
    Ferreira AD; César CC; Malta DC; Andrade AC; Ramos CG; Proietti FA; Bernal RT; Caiaffa WT
    Rev Bras Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 14 Suppl 1():16-30. PubMed ID: 22002139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Body mass index: comparing mean values and prevalence rates from telephone and examination surveys.
    Paccaud F; Wietlisbach V; Rickenbach M
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2001 Feb; 49(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 11226917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Telephone sampling bias in surveying disability.
    Freeman HE; Kiecolt KJ; Nicholls WL; Shanks JM
    Public Opin Q; 1982; 46(3):392-407. PubMed ID: 10258862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reevaluating the need for concern regarding noncoverage bias in landline surveys.
    Blumberg SJ; Luke JV
    Am J Public Health; 2009 Oct; 99(10):1806-10. PubMed ID: 19696381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of estimates of population-based surveys.
    Francisco PM; Barros MB; Segri NJ; Alves MC
    Rev Saude Publica; 2013 Feb; 47(1):60-8. PubMed ID: 23703131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methodologic changes in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System in 2011 and potential effects on prevalence estimates.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2012 Jun; 61(22):410-3. PubMed ID: 22672976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mental health status of the South Australian population.
    Taylor AW; Wilson DH; Dal Grande E; Ben-Tovim D; Elzinga RH; Goldney RD; MacFarlane AC; Cheok F; Kirke K
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2000 Feb; 24(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 10777975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increasing response rates in telephone surveys: a randomized trial.
    Smith W; Chey T; Jalaludin B; Salkeld G; Capon T
    J Public Health Med; 1995 Mar; 17(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 7786565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.