These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. [Comparative analysis of edentulous patients treated traditionally and with the use of a face-bow and Quick Master articulator]. Kubrak J Ann Acad Med Stetin; 1998; 44():237-49. PubMed ID: 9857542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Using acrylic resin tooth veneers in patients with an abnormal jaw relationship: a case report. Yang TC; Lan YH; Wang TM; Tu CY; Lin LD Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(6):570-2. PubMed ID: 25390873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A laboratory study of changes in vertical dimension using acrylic resin and porcelain teeth. Dukes BS; Fields H; Olson JW J Am Dent Assoc; 1983 Jun; 106(6):842-3. PubMed ID: 6576021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Effect of denture thickness on tooth movement during processing of complete dentures. Jamani KD; Moligoda Abuzar MA J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Sep; 25(9):725-9. PubMed ID: 9758405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A procedure for constructing dentures with interchangeable teeth. Khamis MM; Zaki HS J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Dec; 78(6):609-13. PubMed ID: 9421791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Gerber registration with functional impressions--a significant alternative in fabrication of complete denture?]. Wöstmann B ZWR; 1989 Aug; 98(8):696-9. PubMed ID: 2700862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Bond strength variation of synthetic resin teeth in dentures. Cunningham JL; Benington IC Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 7710628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Trial of a CAD/CAM system for fabricating complete dentures. Kanazawa M; Inokoshi M; Minakuchi S; Ohbayashi N Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 21282882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Functional impressions for complete denture fabrication. A modified jump technique. Haney SJ; Nicoll R; Mansueto M Tex Dent J; 2010 Apr; 127(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 20446488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The qualitative assessment of complete dentures produced by commercial dental laboratories. Barsby MJ; Hellyer PH; Schwarz WD Br Dent J; 1995 Jul; 179(2):51-7. PubMed ID: 7632481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Interocclusal wax impressions for use in provisional and associated fixed prosthodontic procedures. Hoffman JM; Rubin MK J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Oct; 62(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 2685239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effect of double flasking and investing methods on artificial teeth movement in complete dentures processing. Sotto-Maior BS; Jóia FA; Meloto CB; Cury AA; Rizzatti-Barbosa CM Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e435-9. PubMed ID: 21615784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Changes in vertical dimension of occlusion in conventional and microwave processing of complete dentures. Nelson MW; Kotwal KR; Sevedge SR J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Feb; 65(2):306-8. PubMed ID: 2051370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A newer approach in positioning teeth for dental prosthetics using lateral cephalometric, trans-cranial radiographs, and the Denar-Witzig articulator: a case of hypodontia in an adolescent patient. Chapra A; White GE J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 26(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 11688808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison between dimensional accuracy of dentures produced with pour-type resin and with heat-processed materials. Grant AA; Atkinson HF J Prosthet Dent; 1971 Sep; 26(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 5284183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. A complete denture impression technique survey of postdoctoral prosthodontic programs in the United States. Mehra M; Vahidi F; Berg RW J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 24118134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]