These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9745377)

  • 1. Local and relational aspects of face distinctiveness.
    Leder H; Bruce V
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 Aug; 51(3):449-73. PubMed ID: 9745377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Super face-inversion effects for isolated internal or external features, and for fractured faces.
    Moscovitch M; Moscovitch DA
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2000 Feb; 17(1):201-19. PubMed ID: 20945180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When inverted faces are recognized: the role of configural information in face recognition.
    Leder H; Bruce V
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):513-36. PubMed ID: 10881616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is face distinctiveness gender based?
    Baudouin JY; Gallay M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):789-98. PubMed ID: 16846279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex.
    Mazard A; Schiltz C; Rossion B
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(6):912-22. PubMed ID: 16229867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces.
    Leder H; Candrian G; Huber O; Bruce V
    Perception; 2001; 30(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 11257979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity of 4-year-olds to featural and second-order relational changes in face distinctiveness.
    McKone E; Boyer BL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Jun; 94(2):134-62. PubMed ID: 16483596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attractiveness, distinctiveness, and recognition of faces: attractive faces can be typical or distinctive but are not better recognized.
    Wickham LH; Morris PE
    Am J Psychol; 2003; 116(3):455-68. PubMed ID: 14503395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Face-specific configural processing of relational information.
    Leder H; Carbon CC
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):19-29. PubMed ID: 16464285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attention to upside-down faces: An exception to the inversion effect.
    Bindemann M; Burton AM
    Vision Res; 2008 Nov; 48(25):2555-61. PubMed ID: 18809423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inversion and configuration of faces.
    Bartlett JC; Searcy J
    Cogn Psychol; 1993 Jul; 25(3):281-316. PubMed ID: 8354050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Qualitative differences in the exploration of upright and upside-down faces in four-month-old infants: an eye-movement study.
    Gallay M; Baudouin JY; Durand K; Lemoine C; Lécuyer R
    Child Dev; 2006; 77(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16942501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Face distinctiveness and delayed testing: differential effects on performance and confidence.
    Metzger MM
    J Gen Psychol; 2006 Apr; 133(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 16705913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of inversion on the encoding of normal and "thatcherized" faces.
    Boutsen L; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):955-75. PubMed ID: 12881166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of experimental design on memory for typical and distinctive faces.
    Hosie JA; Milne AB
    Memory; 1996 Mar; 4(2):175-97. PubMed ID: 8697036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why are familiar-only experiences more frequent for voices than for faces?
    Hanley JR; Turner JM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Nov; 53(4):1105-16. PubMed ID: 11131815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Face inversion superiority in a case of prosopagnosia following congenital brain abnormalities: what can it tell us about the specificity and origin of face-processing mechanisms?
    Schmalzl L; Palermo R; Harris IM; Coltheart M
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2009 May; 26(3):286-306. PubMed ID: 19657795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Faces forming traces: neurophysiological correlates of learning naturally distinctive and caricatured faces.
    Schulz C; Kaufmann JM; Kurt A; Schweinberger SR
    Neuroimage; 2012 Oct; 63(1):491-500. PubMed ID: 22796993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Face inversion disproportionately impairs the perception of vertical but not horizontal relations between features.
    Goffaux V; Rossion B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):995-1002. PubMed ID: 17683242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of distinctiveness on memory and metamemory for face-name associations.
    Watier N; Collin C
    Memory; 2012; 20(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 22171812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.