These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9745377)

  • 21. Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: a repetition study using ERPs.
    Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
    Neuroimage; 2002 Feb; 15(2):353-72. PubMed ID: 11798271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Why is the N170 enhanced for inverted faces? An ERP competition experiment.
    Sadeh B; Yovel G
    Neuroimage; 2010 Nov; 53(2):782-9. PubMed ID: 20558303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Recognizing unfamiliar faces: the effects of distinctiveness and view.
    Newell FN; Chiroro P; Valentine T
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 May; 52(2):509-34. PubMed ID: 10428688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Face inversion disrupts the perception of vertical relations between features in the right human occipito-temporal cortex.
    Goffaux V; Rossion B; Sorger B; Schiltz C; Goebel R
    J Neuropsychol; 2009 Mar; 3(Pt 1):45-67. PubMed ID: 19338716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification.
    Gaspar C; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ
    Vision Res; 2008 Dec; 48(28):2817-26. PubMed ID: 18835403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Acquired prosopagnosia abolishes the face inversion effect.
    Busigny T; Rossion B
    Cortex; 2010 Sep; 46(8):965-81. PubMed ID: 19683710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs.
    Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1518-32. PubMed ID: 15050576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Recalling episodic information about personally known faces and voices.
    Barsics C; Brédart S
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Jun; 20(2):303-8. PubMed ID: 20381380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of configural information in facial emotion recognition in schizophrenia.
    Chambon V; Baudouin JY; Franck N
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2437-44. PubMed ID: 16806310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Face recognition memory and configural processing: a developmental ERP study using upright, inverted, and contrast-reversed faces.
    Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 16(3):487-502. PubMed ID: 15072683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Not all faces are processed equally: evidence for featural rather than holistic processing of one's own face in a face-imaging task.
    Greenberg SN; Goshen-Gottstein Y
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):499-508. PubMed ID: 19271862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception.
    Rossion B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):274-89. PubMed ID: 18396260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Electrophysiological correlates of facial decision: insights from upright and upside-down Mooney-face perception.
    George N; Jemel B; Fiori N; Chaby L; Renault B
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):663-73. PubMed ID: 15890502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perceptual learning modifies inversion effects for faces and textures.
    Hussain Z; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ
    Vision Res; 2009 Sep; 49(18):2273-84. PubMed ID: 19555706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The utility of surface reflectance for the recognition of upright and inverted faces.
    Russell R; Biederman I; Nederhouser M; Sinha P
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 17174375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Cambridge Face Memory Test: results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants.
    Duchaine B; Nakayama K
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):576-85. PubMed ID: 16169565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Upright versus upside-down faces: how interface attractiveness varies with orientation.
    Bäuml KH
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Aug; 56(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 7971117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Configural processing and face viewpoint.
    McKone E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):310-27. PubMed ID: 18377173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evidence for holistic processing of faces viewed as photographic negatives.
    Hole GJ; George PA; Dunsmore V
    Perception; 1999; 28(3):341-59. PubMed ID: 10615472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: direct evidence.
    Freire A; Lee K; Symons LA
    Perception; 2000; 29(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10820599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.