These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9745737)

  • 21. Effect of modulation of basilar membrane position on the cochlear microphonic.
    Pierson M; Møller A
    Hear Res; 1980 Mar; 2(2):151-62. PubMed ID: 7364670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Timing of cochlear feedback: spatial and temporal representation of a tone across the basilar membrane.
    Nilsen KE; Russell IJ
    Nat Neurosci; 1999 Jul; 2(7):642-8. PubMed ID: 10404197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Research on basilar membrane vibration of guinea pigs elicited by direct current pulse].
    Guo M; Ren T; Nuttall AL
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Oct; 32(5):259-63. PubMed ID: 10743087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The radial pattern of basilar membrane motion evoked by electric stimulation of the cochlea.
    Nuttall AL; Guo M; Ren T
    Hear Res; 1999 May; 131(1-2):39-46. PubMed ID: 10355603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cochlear mechanisms at low frequencies in the guinea pig.
    Franke R; Dancer A
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1982; 234(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 7092710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intracochlear sound pressure measurements in guinea pigs.
    Dancer A; Franke R
    Hear Res; 1980 Jun; 2(3-4):191-205. PubMed ID: 7410227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Long-term effects of acoustic trauma on electrically evoked otoacoustic emission.
    Halsey K; Fegelman K; Raphael Y; Grosh K; Dolan DF
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 6(4):324-40. PubMed ID: 16193378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cochlear transducer operating point adaptation.
    Zou Y; Zheng J; Ren T; Nuttall A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2232-41. PubMed ID: 16642838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interaction between adenosine triphosphate and mechanically induced modulation of electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Kirk DL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2749-58. PubMed ID: 12083210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stimulus biasing: a comparison between cochlear hair cell and organ of Corti response patterns.
    Cheatham MA; Dallos P
    Hear Res; 1994 May; 75(1-2):103-13. PubMed ID: 8071136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The sources of electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Zou Y; Zheng J; Nuttall AL; Ren T
    Hear Res; 2003 Jun; 180(1-2):91-100. PubMed ID: 12782357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Acoustic enhancement of electrically-evoked otoacoustic emissions reflects basilar membrane tuning: experiment results.
    Xue S; Mountain DC; Hubbard AE
    Hear Res; 1993 Oct; 70(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 8276728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Wever and Lawrence revisited: effects of nulling basilar membrane movement on concomitant whole-nerve action potential.
    Offut G
    J Aud Res; 1986 Jan; 26(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 3610990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. High-frequency electromotile responses in the cochlea.
    Grosh K; Zheng J; Zou Y; de Boer E; Nuttall AL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2178-84. PubMed ID: 15139629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Basilar membrane vibration is not involved in the reverse propagation of otoacoustic emissions.
    He W; Ren T
    Sci Rep; 2013; 3():1874. PubMed ID: 23695199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Inner hair cell responses to the velocity of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig.
    Nuttall AL; Brown MC; Masta RI; Lawrence M
    Brain Res; 1981 Apr; 211(1):171-4. PubMed ID: 7225832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Effects of direct current on vibration of cochlear basilar membrane].
    Guo M
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(5):338-41. PubMed ID: 12761940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Acoustical modulation of electrically evoked otoacoustic emission in intact gerbil cochlea.
    Ren T; Nuttall AL
    Hear Res; 1998 Jun; 120(1-2):7-16. PubMed ID: 9667426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Otoacoustic emissions evoked by electrical stimulation].
    Yoshida M; Fujimura K; Makishima K
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1997 Dec; 100(12):1459-64. PubMed ID: 9465610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The modulation of the sensitivity of the mammalian cochlea by low frequency tones. I. Primary afferent activity.
    Patuzzi R; Sellick PM; Johnstone BM
    Hear Res; 1984 Jan; 13(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 6706858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.