101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9745739)
1. The auditory evoked potential difference tone and cubic difference tone measured from the inferior colliculus of the chinchilla.
Arnold S; Burkard R
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Sep; 104(3 Pt 1):1565-73. PubMed ID: 9745739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Studies of interaural attenuation to investigate the validity of a dichotic difference tone response recorded from the inferior colliculus in the chinchilla.
Arnold S; Burkard R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1541-7. PubMed ID: 10738808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory distortion products measured with averaged auditory evoked potentials.
Chertoff ME; Hecox KE; Goldstein R
J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Feb; 35(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 1735965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of nembutal anesthesia on the auditory steady-state response (ASSR) from the inferior colliculus and auditory cortex of the chinchilla.
Szalda K; Burkard R
Hear Res; 2005 May; 203(1-2):32-44. PubMed ID: 15855028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in White Leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): effects of frequency ratio and relative level.
Burkard R; Salvi R; Chen L
Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(4):197-213. PubMed ID: 9390802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanical responses to two-tone distortion products in the apical and basal turns of the mammalian cochlea.
Cooper NP; Rhode WS
J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jul; 78(1):261-70. PubMed ID: 9242278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inner hair cell loss and steady-state potentials from the inferior colliculus and auditory cortex of the chinchilla.
Arnold S; Burkard R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug; 112(2):590-9. PubMed ID: 12186040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tuning curves of the difference tone auditory nerve neurophonic.
Henry KR
Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 99(1-2):160-7. PubMed ID: 8970824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
Abdala C
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Near-field responses from the round window, inferior colliculus, and auditory cortex of the unanesthetized chinchilla: manipulations of noiseburst level and rate.
Burkard RF; Secor CA; Salvi RJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jul; 106(1):304-12. PubMed ID: 10420623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
Lai J; Bartlett EL
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sex differences in auditory sensitivity of chinchillas before and after exposure to impulse noise.
McFadden SL; Henselman LW; Zheng XY
Ear Hear; 1999 Apr; 20(2):164-74. PubMed ID: 10229517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of a second stimulus on the auditory steady state response (ASSR) from the inferior colliculus of the chinchilla.
McNerney KM; Burkard RF
Int J Audiol; 2010 Aug; 49(8):561-73. PubMed ID: 20210591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrophysiological evidence of nonlinear distortion products to two-tone stimuli.
Rickman MD; Chertoff ME; Hecox KE
J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jun; 89(6):2818-26. PubMed ID: 1918625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2 - f1 and 2f1 - f2.
Siegel JH; Kim DO; Molnar CE
J Neurophysiol; 1982 Feb; 47(2):303-28. PubMed ID: 7062102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. II. Estimating tuning characteristics using three stimulus tones.
Mills DM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jan; 103(1):507-23. PubMed ID: 9440336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/f1 ratio.
Harris FP; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Stagner BB; Coats AC; Martin GK
J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):220-9. PubMed ID: 2921404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Frequency responses of two- and three-tone distortion product otoacoustic emissions in Mongolian gerbils.
Mills DM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2586-602. PubMed ID: 10830382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory nerve neurophonic produced by the frequency difference of two simultaneously presented tones.
Henry KR
Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 99(1-2):151-9. PubMed ID: 8970823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Auditory fear conditioning modifies steady-state evoked potentials in the rat inferior colliculus.
Lockmann ALV; Mourão FAG; Moraes MFD
J Neurophysiol; 2017 Aug; 118(2):1012-1020. PubMed ID: 28446582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
