BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9747524)

  • 1. Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory: further support for an asymmetry.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Craik FI; Guez J; Dori H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Sep; 24(5):1091-104. PubMed ID: 9747524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: the resiliency of retrieval processes.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Craik FI; Perretta JG; Tonev ST
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):609-25. PubMed ID: 10994220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Asymmetry between encoding and retrieval processes: evidence from divided attention and a calibration analysis.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Craik FI; Gavrilescu D; Anderson ND
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Sep; 28(6):965-76. PubMed ID: 11105522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toward specifying the attentional demands of recognition memory.
    Hicks JL; Marsh RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Nov; 26(6):1483-98. PubMed ID: 11185778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Divided attention in younger and older adults: effects of strategy and relatedness on memory performance and secondary task costs.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Craik FI; Guez J; Kreuger S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):520-37. PubMed ID: 15910135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Memory and attention: A double dissociation between memory encoding and memory retrieval.
    Mulligan NW; Spataro P; West JT
    Cognition; 2023 Sep; 238():105509. PubMed ID: 37354786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fractionation of the component processes underlying successful episodic encoding: a combined fMRI and divided-attention study.
    Uncapher MR; Rugg MD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):240-54. PubMed ID: 18275332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concurrent task effects on memory encoding and retrieval: further support for an asymmetry.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Kilb A; Fisher T
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jan; 34(1):90-101. PubMed ID: 16686109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: assessment of attentional costs and a componential analysis.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Guez J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Nov; 26(6):1461-82. PubMed ID: 11185777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of divided attention at encoding and retrieval: Further data.
    Craik FIM; Eftekhari E; Binns MA
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1263-1277. PubMed ID: 29934748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.
    Craik FI; Govoni R; Naveh-Benjamin M; Anderson ND
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1996 Jun; 125(2):159-80. PubMed ID: 8683192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The asymmetrical effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: a different view based on an interference with the episodic register.
    Guez J; Naveh-Benjamin M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e74447. PubMed ID: 24040249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dual task demands on encoding and retrieval processes: evidence from healthy adult ageing.
    Logie RH; Della Sala S; MacPherson SE; Cooper J
    Cortex; 2007 Jan; 43(1):159-69. PubMed ID: 17334215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conditional automaticity: interference effects on the implicit memory retrieval process.
    Lin J; Meng Y; Lin W
    Psychol Res; 2021 Feb; 85(1):223-237. PubMed ID: 31302775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of divided attention on memory for items and their context.
    Troyer AK; Craik FI
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2000 Sep; 54(3):161-71. PubMed ID: 11021036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are attentional resources a mediator for sex differences in memory?
    Seçer I; Yılmazoğulları Y
    Int J Psychol; 2016 Apr; 51(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 25451245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Divided attention can enhance memory encoding: the attentional boost effect in implicit memory.
    Spataro P; Mulligan NW; Rossi-Arnaud C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1223-31. PubMed ID: 23356238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of semantically related distractors during encoding and retrieval of words in long-term memory.
    Meade ME; Fernandes MA
    Memory; 2016 Jul; 24(6):801-11. PubMed ID: 26277934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs.
    Anderson ND; Craik FI; Naveh-Benjamin M
    Psychol Aging; 1998 Sep; 13(3):405-23. PubMed ID: 9793117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of age and a divided attention task presented during encoding and retrieval on memory.
    Park DC; Smith AD; Dudley WN; Lafronza VN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Nov; 15(6):1185-91. PubMed ID: 2530311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.