These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9747525)

  • 1. A decrement-to-familiarity interpretation of the revelation effect from forced-choice tests of recognition memory.
    Hicks JL; Marsh RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Sep; 24(5):1105-20. PubMed ID: 9747525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of familiarity level and repetition on recognition accuracy.
    Tussing AA; Greene RL
    Am J Psychol; 2001; 114(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 11258228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does familiarity change in the revelation effect?
    Verde MF; Rotello CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):739-46. PubMed ID: 14516209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Altering the balance of recollection and familiarity influences the revelation effect.
    Landau JD
    Am J Psychol; 2001; 114(3):425-37. PubMed ID: 11641888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Event-related potential evidence for multiple causes of the revelation effect.
    Leynes PA; Landau J; Walker J; Addante RJ
    Conscious Cogn; 2005 Jun; 14(2):327-50. PubMed ID: 15950886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Under what conditions is recognition spared relative to recall after selective hippocampal damage in humans?
    Holdstock JS; Mayes AR; Roberts N; Cezayirli E; Isaac CL; O'Reilly RC; Norman KA
    Hippocampus; 2002; 12(3):341-51. PubMed ID: 12099485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Null category-length and target-lure relatedness effects in episodic recognition: a constraint on item-noise interference models.
    Cho KW; Neely JH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1331-55. PubMed ID: 23234500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Familiarity-based recognition in the young, healthy elderly, mild cognitive impaired and Alzheimer's patients.
    Algarabel S; Escudero J; Mazón JF; Pitarque A; Fuentes M; Peset V; Lacruz L
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Aug; 47(10):2056-64. PubMed ID: 19467356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition memory: a study of the effects of test format and aging.
    Bastin C; Van der Linden M
    Neuropsychology; 2003 Jan; 17(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 12597069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Test of competing explanations of the bizarre response bias in recognition memory.
    Worthen JB; Eller LS
    J Gen Psychol; 2002 Jan; 129(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 12038493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of familiarity in item recognition, associative recognition, and plurality recognition on self-paced and speeded tests.
    Westerman DL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):723-32. PubMed ID: 11394676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring the recognition memory deficit in Parkinson's disease: estimates of recollection versus familiarity.
    Davidson PS; Anaki D; Saint-Cyr JA; Chow TW; Moscovitch M
    Brain; 2006 Jul; 129(Pt 7):1768-79. PubMed ID: 16714314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Activating the critical lure during study is unnecessary for false recognition.
    Zeelenberg R; Boot I; Pecher D
    Conscious Cogn; 2005 Jun; 14(2):316-26. PubMed ID: 15950885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. fMRI evidence of word frequency and strength effects during episodic memory encoding.
    de Zubicaray GI; McMahon KL; Eastburn MM; Finnigan S; Humphreys MS
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):439-50. PubMed ID: 15722213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recollection-based recognition eliminates the revelation effect in memory.
    Westerman DL
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Mar; 28(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 10790972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: a complementary-learning-systems approach.
    Norman KA; O'Reilly RC
    Psychol Rev; 2003 Oct; 110(4):611-46. PubMed ID: 14599236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Honeybees (Apis mellifera) holding on to memories: response competition causes retroactive interference effects.
    Cheng K; Wignall AE
    Anim Cogn; 2006 Apr; 9(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 16374626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. False recognition of emotional word lists in aging and Alzheimer disease.
    Budson AE; Todman RW; Chong H; Adams EH; Kensinger EA; Krangel TS; Wright CI
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2006 Jun; 19(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 16783129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the role of individual items in recognition memory and metacognition: challenges for signal detection theory.
    Busey TA; Arici A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1123-36. PubMed ID: 19686009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A neuro-psychological test (T-K-W test) for dementia based on working memory theory and item-response theory: its development and construction].
    Namiki H; Shinohara Y; Yamamoto M; Yonekura Y
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2002; 104(8):690-709. PubMed ID: 12451719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.