326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9747795)
1. Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation.
Seki M; Yuasa N; Ohkuni K
J Orthop Res; 1998 Jul; 16(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 9747795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of acetabular component anteversion on dislocation mechanisms in total hip arthroplasty.
Higa M; Tanino H; Abo M; Kakunai S; Banks SA
J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1810-3. PubMed ID: 21529811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject-specific approach.
Kessler O; Patil S; Wirth S; Mayr E; Colwell CW; D'Lima DD
J Orthop Res; 2008 Apr; 26(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 18050356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A three-dimensional parameterized and visually kinematic simulation module for the theoretical range of motion of total hip arthroplasty.
Ji WT; Tao K; Wang CT
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Jun; 25(5):427-32. PubMed ID: 20189695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty.
Vendittoli PA; Ganapathi M; Nuño N; Plamondon D; Lavigne M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Nov; 22(9):1004-12. PubMed ID: 17870221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios.
D'Lima DD; Urquhart AG; Buehler KO; Walker RH; Colwell CW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Mar; 82(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 10724224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Femur first in hip arthroplasty--the concept of combined anteversion].
Sendtner E; Müller M; Winkler R; Wörner M; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Mar; 148(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 20376760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Movement mapping as dynamic preoperative surgical planning in total hip replacement. A precondition to navigation?
Jerosch J; Weipert A; Hanusek S; Schneppenheim M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2002 Jul; 122(6):342-5. PubMed ID: 12136299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanics of large femoral heads: what they do and don't do.
Crowninshield RD; Maloney WJ; Wentz DH; Humphrey SM; Blanchard CR
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Dec; (429):102-7. PubMed ID: 15577473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A computer model of the position of the combined component in the prevention of impingement in total hip replacement.
Barsoum WK; Patterson RW; Higuera C; Klika AK; Krebs VE; Molloy R
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jun; 89(6):839-45. PubMed ID: 17613516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The combined anteversion technique for acetabular component anteversion.
Amuwa C; Dorr LD
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7):1068-70. PubMed ID: 18534533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.
Widmer KH; Majewski M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Aug; 20(7):723-8. PubMed ID: 15964112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impingement after total hip arthroplasty related to prosthetic component selection and range of motion.
Gondi G; Roberson JR; Ganey TM; Shahriari A; Hutton WC
J South Orthop Assoc; 1997; 6(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 9434247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modular neck for prevention of prosthetic impingement in cases with excessively anteverted femur.
Miki H; Sugano N
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Nov; 26(9):944-9. PubMed ID: 21680069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Analytical computational model for the determination of the influence of design and surgical factors on the range of motion of total hip replacements].
Kliewe C; Souffrant R; Kluess D; Woernle C; Brökel K; Bader R
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2010 Feb; 55(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 20128745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anatomic hip range of motion after implantation during total hip arthroplasty as measured by a navigation system.
Miki H; Yamanashi W; Nishii T; Sato Y; Yoshikawa H; Sugano N
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Oct; 22(7):946-52. PubMed ID: 17920464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of the transverse acetabular ligament for acetabular component orientation in total hip replacement: an analysis of acetabular component position and range of movement using navigation software.
Kalteis T; Sendtner E; Beverland D; Archbold PA; Hube R; Schuster T; Renkawitz T; Grifka J
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Aug; 93(8):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21768623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements.
Yoshimine F
J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1315-23. PubMed ID: 15894324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of the oscillation angle and the neck anteversion of the prosthesis on the cup safe-zone that fulfills the criteria for range of motion in total hip replacements. The required oscillation angle for an acceptable cup safe-zone.
Yoshimine F
J Biomech; 2005 Jan; 38(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 15519347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differences in range of motion with the same combined anteversion after total hip arthroplasty.
Ohmori T; Kabata T; Kajino Y; Taga T; Hasegawa K; Inoue D; Yamamoto T; Takagi T; Yoshitani J; Ueno T; Tsuchiya H
Int Orthop; 2018 May; 42(5):1021-1028. PubMed ID: 28990125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
