146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9747869)
1. Diagnostic testing following screening mammography in the elderly.
Welch HG; Fisher ES
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1998 Sep; 90(18):1389-92. PubMed ID: 9747869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing the performance of mammography screening in the USA and the UK.
Smith-Bindman R; Ballard-Barbash R; Miglioretti DL; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 15814020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can Medicare billing claims data be used to assess mammography utilization among women ages 65 and older?
Smith-Bindman R; Quale C; Chu PW; Rosenberg R; Kerlikowske K
Med Care; 2006 May; 44(5):463-70. PubMed ID: 16641665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom.
Smith-Bindman R; Chu PW; Miglioretti DL; Sickles EA; Blanks R; Ballard-Barbash R; Bobo JK; Lee NC; Wallis MG; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K
JAMA; 2003 Oct; 290(16):2129-37. PubMed ID: 14570948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors associated with imaging and procedural events used to detect breast cancer after screening mammography.
Carney PA; Abraham LA; Miglioretti DL; Yabroff KR; Sickles EA; Buist DS; Kasales CJ; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Dignan MB; Weaver DL; Kerlikowske K;
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 17242246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures.
Brown ML; Houn F; Sickles EA; Kessler LG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1373-7. PubMed ID: 7484568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of risk factors on breast carcinoma screening of Medicare-insured older women. National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Screening Consortium.
Roetzheim R; Fox SA; Leake B; Houn F
Cancer; 1996 Dec; 78(12):2526-34. PubMed ID: 8952561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Serendipity in diagnostic imaging: magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.
Lawrence WF; Liang W; Mandelblatt JS; Gold KF; Freedman M; Ascher SM; Trock BJ; Chang P
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1998 Dec; 90(23):1792-800. PubMed ID: 9839519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast cancer screening among low-income or uninsured women: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, July 1995 to March 2002 (United States).
Eheman CR; Benard VB; Blackman D; Lawson HW; Anderson C; Helsel W; Lee NC
Cancer Causes Control; 2006 Feb; 17(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 16411050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening Mammography Use Among Older Women Before and After the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations.
Chang CH; Bynum JP; Onega T; Colla CH; Lurie JD; Tosteson AN
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2016 Oct; 25(10):1030-1037. PubMed ID: 27427790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical outcomes of mammography in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2009-2012.
White A; Miller J; Royalty J; Ryerson AB; Benard V; Helsel W; Kammerer W
Cancer Causes Control; 2015 May; 26(5):723-32. PubMed ID: 25809209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What Happens after a Diagnosis of High-Risk Breast Lesion at Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Biopsy? An Observational Study of Postdiagnosis Management and Imaging Adherence.
Gao Y; Albert M; Young Lin LL; Lewin AA; Babb JS; Heller SL; Moy L
Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):423-431. PubMed ID: 29378151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trends in mammography 1991-96 and the impact of nationwide screening in The Netherlands.
van Leiden HA; van Gessel-Dabekaussen AA; van der Maas PJ; de Koning HJ
J Med Screen; 1999; 6(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 10444728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations.
Elmore JG; Barton MB; Moceri VM; Polk S; Arena PJ; Fletcher SW
N Engl J Med; 1998 Apr; 338(16):1089-96. PubMed ID: 9545356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast Biopsy Intensity and Findings Following Breast Cancer Screening in Women With and Without a Personal History of Breast Cancer.
Buist DSM; Abraham L; Lee CI; Lee JM; Lehman C; O'Meara ES; Stout NK; Henderson LM; Hill D; Wernli KJ; Haas JS; Tosteson ANA; Kerlikowske K; Onega T;
JAMA Intern Med; 2018 Apr; 178(4):458-468. PubMed ID: 29435556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating wait times from screening to breast cancer diagnosis among women undergoing organised assessment vs usual care.
Chiarelli AM; Muradali D; Blackmore KM; Smith CR; Mirea L; Majpruz V; O'Malley FP; Quan ML; Holloway CM
Br J Cancer; 2017 May; 116(10):1254-1263. PubMed ID: 28359079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient Cost-Sharing and Utilization of Breast Cancer Diagnostic Imaging by Patients Undergoing Subsequent Testing After a Screening Mammogram.
Hughes DR; Espinoza W; Fein S; Rula EY; McGinty G
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Mar; 6(3):e234893. PubMed ID: 36972047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
