145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9748928)
1. Treating skin tears in nursing home residents: a pilot study comparing four types of dressings.
Edwards H; Gaskill D; Nash R
Int J Nurs Pract; 1998 Mar; 4(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9748928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study of three occlusive dressings in the treatment of full-thickness wounds in pigs.
Agren MS; Mertz PM; Franzén L
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1997 Jan; 36(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 8996261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A multi-center, randomized, clinical trial comparing adhesive polyurethane foam dressing and adhesive hydrocolloid dressing in patients with grade II pressure ulcers in primary care and nursing homes.
Guillén-Solà M; Soler Mieras A; Tomàs-Vidal AM;
BMC Fam Pract; 2013 Dec; 14():196. PubMed ID: 24359122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using transparent polyurethane film and hydrocolloid dressings to prevent pressure ulcers.
Dutra RA; Salomé GM; Alves JR; Pereira VO; Miranda FD; Vallim VB; de Brito MJ; Ferreira LM
J Wound Care; 2015 Jun; 24(6):268, 270-1, 273-5. PubMed ID: 26075375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biofilm hydrogel dressing: a clinical evaluation in the treatment of pressure sores.
Darkovich SL; Brown-Etris M; Spencer M
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1990; 29():47-60. PubMed ID: 2202317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Healing rate of hospital-acquired skin tears using adhesive silicone foam versus meshed silicone interface dressings: A prospective, randomized, non-inferiority pilot study.
Fulbrook P; Miles SJ; Williams DM
Int J Nurs Pract; 2024 Jun; 30(3):e13229. PubMed ID: 38123157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Wounds and dressings note. 2--hydrocolloids].
Meaume S
Soins; 2003 May; (675):25-6. PubMed ID: 12784471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Two hydrocolloid dressings evaluated in experimental full-thickness wounds in the skin.
Agren MS; Everland H
Acta Derm Venereol; 1997 Mar; 77(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 9111823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study of wound dressings on full-thickness wounds in micropigs.
Gokoo C; Burhop K
Decubitus; 1993 Sep; 6(5):42-3, 46, 48 passim. PubMed ID: 8286020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The assessment and management of skin tears in care homes.
Stephen-Haynes J; Callaghan R; Bethell E; Greenwood M
Br J Nurs; 2011 Jun 10-23; 20(11):S12, S14, S16 passim. PubMed ID: 21727845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of three wound dressings in patients undergoing heart surgery.
Wikblad K; Anderson B
Nurs Res; 1995; 44(5):312-6. PubMed ID: 7567488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of an opaque foam dressing versus a transparent film dressing in the management of skin tears in institutionalized subjects.
Thomas DR; Goode PS; LaMaster K; Tennyson T; Parnell LK
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Jun; 45(6):22-4, 27-8. PubMed ID: 10655859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative study of four wound dressings on epithelization of partial-thickness wounds in pigs.
Chvapil M; Chvapil TA; Owen JA
J Trauma; 1987 Mar; 27(3):278-82. PubMed ID: 3560269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modern dressings: what to use.
Findlay D
Aust Fam Physician; 1994 May; 23(5):824-5, 828-9, 832-9. PubMed ID: 8037620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A non-adhesive foam dressing for exuding venous leg ulcers and pressure ulcers: six case studies.
Charles H; Corser R; Varrow S; Hart J
J Wound Care; 2004 Feb; 13(2):58-62. PubMed ID: 14999990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative investigation of re-epithelialisation of split skin graft donor areas after application of hydrocolloid and alginate dressings.
Porter JM
Br J Plast Surg; 1991 Jul; 44(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 1873610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An evaluation of an adhesive hydrocellular foam dressing and a self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing in a nursing home setting.
Viamontes L; Temple D; Wytall D; Walker A
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Aug; 49(8):48-52, 54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 14631663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of three new hydrocolloid dressings: retention of dressing integrity and biodegradability of absorbent components attenuate inflammation.
Chakravarthy D; Rodway N; Schmidt S; Smith D; Evancho M; Sims R
J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Oct; 28(10):1165-73. PubMed ID: 7530252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modern wound dressings.
Casey G
Nurs Stand; 2000 Oct 18-24; 15(5):47-51; quiz 52, 54. PubMed ID: 11971511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of four different dressings on donor site wounds.
Beldon P
Br J Nurs; 2004 Mar; 13(6 Suppl):S38-45. PubMed ID: 15126974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
