These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9749392)

  • 21. Stability of genetic evaluations for active artificial insemination bulls.
    Powell RL; Sanders AH; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2614-20. PubMed ID: 15328286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Method R estimates of heritability for milk, fat, and protein yields of United States dairy cattle.
    Van Tassell CP; Wiggans GR; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 1999 Oct; 82(10):2231-7. PubMed ID: 10531612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relationships of productive life evaluations with changes in evaluations for yields.
    Abdallah JM; McDaniel BT; Tabbaa MJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Mar; 85(3):677-81. PubMed ID: 11949874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. International genetic evaluation of dairy sires using a multiple-trait model with individual animal performance records.
    Weigel KA; Rekaya R; Zwald NR; Fikse WF
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Dec; 84(12):2789-95. PubMed ID: 11814036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Selection response for milk production in conventional production systems in Mexico, using genetic evaluations of Holstein sires from Canada and the United States.
    Montaldo HH; Núñez-Soto SG; Ruiz-López FJ; Castillo-Juárez H
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5270-5. PubMed ID: 19762845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Genetic analysis of Holstein cattle populations in Brazil and the United States.
    Costa CN; Blake RW; Pollak EJ; Oltenacu PA; Quaas RL; Searle SR
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 Dec; 83(12):2963-74. PubMed ID: 11132868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Alternatives for examining daughter performance of progeny-test bulls between official evaluations.
    Norman HD; Wright JR; Weigel KA
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2348-55. PubMed ID: 19389993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Retrospective analysis of the accuracy of conversion equations and multiple-trait, across-country evaluations of Holstein bulls used internationally.
    Weigel KA; Powell RL
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 May; 83(5):1081-8. PubMed ID: 10821583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Direct and indirect conversion of bull evaluations for yield traits between countries.
    Powell RL; Sieber M
    J Dairy Sci; 1992 Apr; 75(4):1138-46. PubMed ID: 1578027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prediction of most recent evaluations of Holstein bulls from first available pedigree information.
    Abdallah JM; McDaniel BT
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Mar; 85(3):670-6. PubMed ID: 11949873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of United States and Danish strains of Jerseys for yield traits.
    Metzger JS; Hansen LB; Norman HD; Wolfe CW; Pedersen J
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 May; 77(5):1457-65. PubMed ID: 8046085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of linear type and production data to supplement early predicted transmitting abilities for productive life.
    Weigel KA; Lawlor TJ; Vanraden PM; Wiggans GR
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Jul; 81(7):2040-4. PubMed ID: 9710774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of variance of interaction effects of sire and herd on selection for milk and fat yield.
    Dimov G; Keown JF; Van Vleck LD; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 1996 Jan; 79(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 8675777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A method for combining United States and Canadian bull evaluations.
    Wiggans GR; VanRaden PM; Powell RL
    J Dairy Sci; 1992 Oct; 75(10):2834-9. PubMed ID: 1430487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Weighting factors of sire daughter information in international genetic evaluations.
    Fikse WF; Banos G
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Jul; 84(7):1759-67. PubMed ID: 11467826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of maturity rate of daughters on genetic ranking of Holstein bulls.
    Norman HD; Wright JR; Powell RL; Vanraden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3337-45. PubMed ID: 16107424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prior (co)variances can improve multiple-trait across-country evaluations of weakly linked bull populations.
    Mark T; Madsen P; Jensen J; Fikse WF
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3290-302. PubMed ID: 16107419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy of predicting genetic merit from pedigree information for bulls entering stud sampling programs.
    Samuelson DJ; Pearson RE
    J Dairy Sci; 1995 Sep; 78(9):2057-66. PubMed ID: 8550915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prediction of longevity breeding values for US Holstein sires using survival analysis methodology.
    Caraviello DZ; Weigel KA; Gianola D
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Oct; 87(10):3518-25. PubMed ID: 15377631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Genetic analysis of herd life in Canadian dairy cattle on a lactation basis using a Weibull proportional hazards model.
    Sewalem A; Kistemaker GJ; Ducrocq V; Van Doormaal BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Jan; 88(1):368-75. PubMed ID: 15591401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.