437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9750244)
1. Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies.
Lin DY; Psaty BM; Kronmal RA
Biometrics; 1998 Sep; 54(3):948-63. PubMed ID: 9750244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies.
McCandless LC; Gustafson P; Levy A
Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(11):2331-47. PubMed ID: 16998821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A sensitivity analysis using information about measured confounders yielded improved uncertainty assessments for unmeasured confounding.
McCandless LC; Gustafson P; Levy AR
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 61(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 18226747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The sign of the unmeasured confounding bias under various standard populations.
Chiba Y
Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):670-6. PubMed ID: 19650054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders.
Arah OA; Chiba Y; Greenland S
Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 18(8):637-46. PubMed ID: 18652982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of longitudinal data with unmeasured confounders.
Palta M; Yao TJ
Biometrics; 1991 Dec; 47(4):1355-69. PubMed ID: 1786323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methods to assess intended effects of drug treatment in observational studies are reviewed.
Klungel OH; Martens EP; Psaty BM; Grobbee DE; Sullivan SD; Stricker BH; Leufkens HG; de Boer A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 57(12):1223-31. PubMed ID: 15617947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of instrumental variables in the analysis of generalized linear models in the presence of unmeasured confounding with applications to epidemiological research.
Johnston KM; Gustafson P; Levy AR; Grootendorst P
Stat Med; 2008 Apr; 27(9):1539-56. PubMed ID: 17847052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating adjusted NNT measures in logistic regression analysis.
Bender R; Kuss O; Hildebrandt M; Gehrmann U
Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5586-95. PubMed ID: 17879268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Bayesian approach to prospective binary outcome studies with misclassification in a binary risk factor.
Prescott GJ; Garthwaite PH
Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3463-77. PubMed ID: 16237661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensitivity analysis: distributional assumptions and confounding assumptions.
Vanderweele TJ
Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):645-9. PubMed ID: 18482060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Case-cohort study of styrene exposure and ischemic heart disease.
Matanoski GM; Tao X
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2002 May; (108):1-29; discussion 31-7. PubMed ID: 12214600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Weaknesses of goodness-of-fit tests for evaluating propensity score models: the case of the omitted confounder.
Weitzen S; Lapane KL; Toledano AY; Hume AL; Mor V
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2005 Apr; 14(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 15386700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating adjusted risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) measures in the Cox regression model.
Laubender RP; Bender R
Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):851-9. PubMed ID: 20213710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Piecewise exponential survival trees with time-dependent covariates.
Huang X; Chen S; Soong SJ
Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1420-33. PubMed ID: 9883542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Invited commentary: variable selection versus shrinkage in the control of multiple confounders.
Greenland S
Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 167(5):523-9; discussion 530-1. PubMed ID: 18227100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensitivity analysis for m-estimates, tests, and confidence intervals in matched observational studies.
Rosenbaum PR
Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):456-64. PubMed ID: 17688498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Regression analysis of doubly censored failure time data using the additive hazards model.
Sun L; Kim YJ; Sun J
Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):637-43. PubMed ID: 15339285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
