438 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9750244)
21. Bayesian modelling of lung cancer risk and bitumen fume exposure adjusted for unmeasured confounding by smoking.
de Vocht F; Kromhout H; Ferro G; Boffetta P; Burstyn I
Occup Environ Med; 2009 Aug; 66(8):502-8. PubMed ID: 19060029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prior event rate ratio adjustment: numerical studies of a statistical method to address unrecognized confounding in observational studies.
Yu M; Xie D; Wang X; Weiner MG; Tannen RL
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2012 May; 21 Suppl 2():60-8. PubMed ID: 22552981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Confounder selection in environmental epidemiology: assessment of health effects of prenatal mercury exposure.
Budtz-Jørgensen E; Keiding N; Grandjean P; Weihe P
Ann Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 17(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17027287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.
Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Analysis of matched case-control data in presence of nonignorable missing exposure.
Sinha S; Maiti T
Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 17573865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Using generalized additive models to reduce residual confounding.
Benedetti A; Abrahamowicz M
Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(24):3781-801. PubMed ID: 15580601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Adjusting for bias and unmeasured confounding in Mendelian randomization studies with binary responses.
Palmer TM; Thompson JR; Tobin MD; Sheehan NA; Burton PR
Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 37(5):1161-8. PubMed ID: 18463132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of omitted confounders on the analysis of correlated binary data.
Chao WH; Palta M; Young T
Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):678-89. PubMed ID: 9192456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Sensitivity of the hazard ratio to nonignorable treatment assignment in an observational study.
Mitra N; Heitjan DF
Stat Med; 2007 Mar; 26(6):1398-414. PubMed ID: 16779876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparing treatment effects after adjustment with multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression and propensity score methods.
Martens EP; de Boer A; Pestman WR; Belitser SV; Stricker BH; Klungel OH
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Jan; 17(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17960554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Meta-analysis of observational studies with unmeasured confounders.
McCandless LC
Int J Biostat; 2012 Jan; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 22499731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bayesian variable selection method for censored survival data.
Faraggi D; Simon R
Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1475-85. PubMed ID: 9883546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Regression analysis of doubly censored failure time data with frailty.
Kim YJ
Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):458-64. PubMed ID: 16918909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Attributable risk function in the proportional hazards model for censored time-to-event.
Chen YQ; Hu C; Wang Y
Biostatistics; 2006 Oct; 7(4):515-29. PubMed ID: 16478758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Missing data in the exposure of interest and marginal structural models: a simulation study based on the Framingham Heart Study.
Shortreed SM; Forbes AB
Stat Med; 2010 Feb; 29(4):431-43. PubMed ID: 20025082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Time-related aspects of the healthy worker survivor effect.
Richardson D; Wing S; Steenland K; McKelvey W
Ann Epidemiol; 2004 Oct; 14(9):633-9. PubMed ID: 15380793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Confounding and interaction in multiple regression].
Ravani P; Malberti F
G Ital Nefrol; 2007; 24(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 17342695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Proportional hazards regression for cancer studies.
Ghosh D
Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):141-8. PubMed ID: 17573863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Confounder-adjusted estimates of the risk difference using propensity score-based weighting.
Ukoumunne OC; Williamson E; Forbes AB; Gulliford MC; Carlin JB
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(30):3126-36. PubMed ID: 21170907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Estimating exposure effects by modelling the expectation of exposure conditional on confounders.
Robins JM; Mark SD; Newey WK
Biometrics; 1992 Jun; 48(2):479-95. PubMed ID: 1637973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
