BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9750891)

  • 1. In vitro function of an adjustable temporary venous spring filter: comparison with the temporary RF02 filter and the permanent Greenfield vena cava filter.
    Hosaka J; Roy S; Kvernebo K; Enge I; Laerum F
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Sep; 5(9):620-5. PubMed ID: 9750891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vivo evaluation of the adjustable temporary venous spring filter and the RF02 temporary filter: comparative study.
    Hosaka J; Roy S; Kvernebo K; Enge I; Laerum F
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Jun; 6(6):343-51. PubMed ID: 10376065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adjustable temporary venous spring filter: in vitro assessment.
    Hosaka J; Roy S; Kvernebo K; Enge I; Laerum F
    Acad Radiol; 1997 Jul; 4(7):513-8. PubMed ID: 9232172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporary inferior vena cava filters: in vitro comparison with permanent IVC filters.
    Stoneham GW; Burbridge BE; Millward SF
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1995; 6(5):731-6. PubMed ID: 8541676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro evaluation of clot capture efficiency of an absorbable vena cava filter.
    Dria SJ; Eggers MD
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2016 Oct; 4(4):472-8. PubMed ID: 27639002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro and in vivo experimental evaluation of a new vena caval filter.
    Qian Z; Yasui K; Nazarian GK; Vlodaver Z; Hunter DW; Castaneda-Zuniga WR; Amplatz K
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1994; 5(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 8054757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of clinically available inferior vena cava filters with an in vitro physiologic simulation of the vena cava.
    Simon M; Rabkin DJ; Kleshinski S; Kim D; Ransil BJ
    Radiology; 1993 Dec; 189(3):769-74. PubMed ID: 8234702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple emboli and filter function: an in vitro comparison of three vena cava filters.
    Xian ZY; Roy S; Hosaka J; Kvernebo K; Laerum F
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1995; 6(6):887-93. PubMed ID: 8850665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Numerical analysis of the hemodynamics and embolus capture of a greenfield vena cava filter.
    Swaminathan TN; Hu HH; Patel AA
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Jun; 128(3):360-70. PubMed ID: 16706585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of prophylactic temporary inferior vena cava filters placed at the ICU bedside under intravascular ultrasound guidance in patients with multiple trauma.
    Rosenthal D; Wellons ED; Levitt AB; Shuler FW; O'Conner RE; Henderson VJ
    J Vasc Surg; 2004 Nov; 40(5):958-64. PubMed ID: 15557911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro evaluation of a new temporary venous filter: the Spring filter.
    Xian ZY; Roy S; Hosaka J; Kuroki K; Kvernebo K; Enge I; Laerum F
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1995; 18(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 8846472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inferior vena cava filters: in vitro comparison of clot trapping and flow dynamics.
    Katsamouris AA; Waltman AC; Delichatsios MA; Athanasoulis CA
    Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 3336712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strut interlocking of titanium Greenfield vena cava filters and its effect on clot capturing: an in vitro study.
    Korbin CD; Van Allan RJ; Andrews RT; Katz MD; Teitelbaum GP
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1994; 17(4):204-6. PubMed ID: 7954574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clover leaf inferior vena cava filter: in vitro evaluation of filter deployment and comparison of emboli-capturing ability.
    Palestrant AM; Faykus MH
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1991 Feb; 2(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 1799740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Criteria for utilization and indications for use of permanent and short- and medium term temporary endocaval filters. Personal experience and review of the literature].
    Fuochi C; Furlan F; Pellegrini M; Moser E; Dalla Palma F
    Radiol Med; 1996 Oct; 92(4):431-7. PubMed ID: 9045246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Temporary and permanent vena cava filter for prevention of pulmonary embolism].
    Wolf F; Funovics M; Dirisamer A; Lammer J
    Wien Med Wochenschr Suppl; 2002; (113):43-5. PubMed ID: 12621839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro evaluation of vena cava filters.
    Hammer FD; Rousseau HP; Joffre FG; Sentenac BP; Tran-Van T; Barthelemy RP
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1994; 5(6):869-76. PubMed ID: 7873867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Thrombus-trapping efficiency of the LGM (Vena Tech) and titanium Greenfield filters in vivo.
    Millward SF; Marsh JI; Pon C; Moher D
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1992 Feb; 3(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 1540709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experience of temporary inferior vena cava filters inserted in the perinatal period to prevent pulmonary embolism in pregnant women with deep vein thrombosis.
    Kawamata K; Chiba Y; Tanaka R; Higashi M; Nishigami K
    J Vasc Surg; 2005 Apr; 41(4):652-6. PubMed ID: 15874930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective randomized study comparing the clinical outcomes between inferior vena cava Greenfield and TrapEase filters.
    Usoh F; Hingorani A; Ascher E; Shiferson A; Patel N; Gopal K; Marks N; Jacob T
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 Aug; 52(2):394-9. PubMed ID: 20570472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.