302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9751359)
1. Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: the perineal approach increases the risk of surgically induced positive margins and capsular incisions.
Boccon-Gibod L; Ravery V; Vordos D; Toublanc M; Delmas V; Boccon-Gibod L
J Urol; 1998 Oct; 160(4):1383-5. PubMed ID: 9751359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A centralized comparison of radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy specimens: is there a difference according to the surgical approach?
Korman HJ; Leu PB; Huang RR; Goldstein NS
J Urol; 2002 Sep; 168(3):991-4. PubMed ID: 12187206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Location of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer.
Salomon L; Anastasiadis AG; Levrel O; Katz R; Saint F; de la Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Urology; 2003 Feb; 61(2):386-90. PubMed ID: 12597953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Complete perineal prostatectomy carries an increased risk of capsular incision in healthy and cancerous tissue].
Vordos D; Ravery V; Toublanc M; Boccon-Gibod L; Delmas V; Boccon-Gibod L
Prog Urol; 1998 Apr; 8(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 9615933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach.
Salomon L; Levrel O; Anastasiadis AG; Saint F; de La Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 12627213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Localization of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy].
Salomon L; Levrel O; de la Taille A; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Prog Urol; 2002 Sep; 12(4):628-34. PubMed ID: 12463122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radical prostatectomy by the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach: 12 years of experience in one center.
Salomon L; Levrel O; de la Taille A; Anastasiadis AG; Saint F; Zaki S; Vordos D; Cicco A; Olsson LE; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Eur Urol; 2002 Aug; 42(2):104-10; discussion 110-1. PubMed ID: 12160579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early prostate-specific antigen failure following radical perineal versus retropubic prostatectomy: the importance of seminal vesicle excision.
Theodorescu D; Lippert MC; Broder SR; Boyd JC
Urology; 1998 Feb; 51(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 9495711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perineal versus retropubic radical prostatectomy for T1, T2 prostate cancer.
Haab F; Boccon-Gibod L; Delmas V; Boccon-Gibod L; Toublanc M
Br J Urol; 1994 Nov; 74(5):626-9. PubMed ID: 7530127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nondissection of pelvic lymph nodes does not influence the results of perineal radical prostatectomy in selected patients.
Salomon L; Hoznek A; Lefrère-Belda MA; Bellot J; Chopin DK; Abbou CC
Eur Urol; 2000 Mar; 37(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 10720855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term hazard of progression after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: continued risk of biochemical failure after 5 years.
Amling CL; Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Seay TM; Slezak J; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jul; 164(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 10840432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does the narrow operating field in perineal radical prostatectomy lead to more positive surgical margins?
Shalev M; Tykochinsky G; Richter S; Kessler OJ; Nissenkorn I
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1998 Aug; 24(4):313-5. PubMed ID: 9725000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk of positive margins and biochemical recurrence in relation to nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.
Sofer M; Hamilton-Nelson KL; Schlesselman JJ; Soloway MS
J Clin Oncol; 2002 Apr; 20(7):1853-8. PubMed ID: 11919244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The presence of positive surgical margins in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer results in biochemical recurrence at a similar rate to that in patients with extracapsular extension and PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml.
Eminaga O; Hinkelammert R; Titze U; Abbas M; Eltze E; Bettendorf O; Semjonow A
Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):32.e17-25. PubMed ID: 23434425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical comparative evaluation of radical retropubic and perineal prostatectomy approaches for prostate cancer.
Zuo W; Hiraoka Y
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2003 Jan; 49(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 12629774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Recurrence following radical surgery for prostatic cancer. Analysis of clinical, biological and anatomo-pathological prognostic factors].
Feyaerts A; Delrée A; Lorge F; Opsomer RJ; Wese FX; Van Cangh PJ; Draguet AP; Cosyns JP
Acta Urol Belg; 1997 Mar; 65(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9245198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does capsular incision at radical retropubic prostatectomy affect disease-free survival in otherwise organ-confined prostate cancer?
Barocas DA; Han M; Epstein JI; Chan DY; Trock BJ; Walsh PC; Partin AW
Urology; 2001 Nov; 58(5):746-51. PubMed ID: 11711353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Isolated local recurrence is rare after radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason 7 prostate cancer and positive surgical margins: therapeutic implications.
Han M; Pound CR; Potter SR; Partin AW; Epstein JI; Walsh PC
J Urol; 2001 Mar; 165(3):864-6. PubMed ID: 11176487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
