These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. The Bennett lesion of the shoulder. De Maeseneer M; Jaovisidha S; Jacobson JA; Tam W; Schils JP; Sartoris DJ; Fronek J; Resnick D J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 9448758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Glenoid version and size: does gender, ethnicity, or body size play a role? Piponov HI; Savin D; Shah N; Esposito D; Schwartz B; Moretti V; Goldberg B Int Orthop; 2016 Nov; 40(11):2347-2353. PubMed ID: 27106214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Location of the optimized centerline of the glenoid vault: a comparison of two operative techniques with use of three-dimensional computer modeling. Lewis GS; Bryce CD; Davison AC; Hollenbeak CS; Piazza SJ; Armstrong AD J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 May; 92(5):1188-94. PubMed ID: 20439665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Subchondral mineralization patterns of the glenoid after tear of the supraspinatus. Anetzberger H; Schulz C; Pfahler M; Refior HJ; Müller-Gerbl M Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Nov; (404):263-8. PubMed ID: 12439268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Radiographic characterization of the B2 glenoid: the effect of computed tomographic axis orientation. Chalmers PN; Salazar D; Chamberlain A; Keener JD J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Feb; 26(2):258-264. PubMed ID: 27592372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The fulcrum axis: a new method for determining glenoid version. Braunstein V; Korner M; Brunner U; Mutschler W; Biberthaler P; Wiedemann E J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2008; 17(5):819-24. PubMed ID: 18619866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of acquired glenoid bone defects on surgical technique and clinical outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Klein SM; Dunning P; Mulieri P; Pupello D; Downes K; Frankle MA J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 May; 92(5):1144-54. PubMed ID: 20439660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The influence of three-dimensional computed tomography images of the shoulder in preoperative planning for total shoulder arthroplasty. Scalise JJ; Codsi MJ; Bryan J; Brems JJ; Iannotti JP J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Nov; 90(11):2438-45. PubMed ID: 18978413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Regional bone density variations in osteoarthritic glenoids: a comparison of symmetric to asymmetric (type B2) erosion patterns. Knowles NK; Athwal GS; Keener JD; Ferreira LM J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Mar; 24(3):425-32. PubMed ID: 25306495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The shape of the inferior part of the glenoid: a cadaveric study. Huysmans PE; Haen PS; Kidd M; Dhert WJ; Willems JW J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2006; 15(6):759-63. PubMed ID: 16990019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Age-related variations in the microstructure of human tibial cancellous bone. Ding M; Odgaard A; Linde F; Hvid I J Orthop Res; 2002 May; 20(3):615-21. PubMed ID: 12038639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss Is Equivalent to 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Quantification: Cadaveric Study. Yanke AB; Shin JJ; Pearson I; Bach BR; Romeo AA; Cole BJ; Verma NN Arthroscopy; 2017 Apr; 33(4):709-715. PubMed ID: 27923707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Simple method of glenoid bone loss calculation using ipsilateral magnetic resonance imaging. Owens BD; Burns TC; Campbell SE; Svoboda SJ; Cameron KL Am J Sports Med; 2013 Mar; 41(3):622-4. PubMed ID: 23339835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]