213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9752805)
1. Effectiveness of prenatal ultrasonography in detecting fetal anomalies and perinatal outcome of anomalous fetuses.
Lee K; Kim SY; Choi SM; Kim JS; Lee BS; Seo K; Lee YH; Kim DK
Yonsei Med J; 1998 Aug; 39(4):372-82. PubMed ID: 9752805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. End-result of routine ultrasound screening for congenital anomalies: the Belgian Multicentric Study 1984-92.
Levi S; Schaaps JP; De Havay P; Coulon R; Defoort P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 5(6):366-71. PubMed ID: 7552796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prenatal sonography for the detection of fetal anomalies: results of a prospective study and comparison with prior series.
Anderson N; Boswell O; Duff G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):943-50. PubMed ID: 7676997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accurate detection of anomalies by routine ultrasonography in an indigent clinic population.
Magriples U; Copel JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Oct; 179(4):978-81. PubMed ID: 9790383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized trial of prenatal ultrasonographic screening: impact on the detection, management, and outcome of anomalous fetuses. The RADIUS Study Group.
Crane JP; LeFevre ML; Winborn RC; Evans JK; Ewigman BG; Bain RP; Frigoletto FD; McNellis D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 171(2):392-9. PubMed ID: 8059817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Termination of Pregnancy for Ultrasound diagnosed Major Fetal Anomalies at a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital: An Initial Experience.
Akinmoladun JA
West Afr J Med; 2021 Aug; 38(8):738-742. PubMed ID: 34499832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Second trimester ultrasound screening performed by midwives; sensitivity for detection of fetal anomalies.
Eurenius K; Axelsson O; Cnattingius S; Eriksson L; Norsted T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Feb; 78(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 10023870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of routine ultrasound in the prenatal diagnosis of structural anomalies of the fetus.
Ashe RG; Dornan JC; Patterson CC; Thompson W
Ir Med J; 1996; 89(5):180-2. PubMed ID: 8936842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Routine ultrasound screening in diabetic pregnancies.
Wong SF; Chan FY; Cincotta RB; Oats JJ; McIntyre HD
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 19(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 11876810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Routine prenatal ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities: 22 years' experience.
Carrera JM; Torrents M; Mortera C; Cusí V; Muñoz A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Mar; 5(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 7788491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is a routine ultrasound in the third trimester justified? Additional fetal anomalies diagnosed after two previous unremarkable ultrasound examinations.
Manegold G; Tercanli S; Struben H; Huang D; Kang A
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Aug; 32(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 21294069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic review of first-trimester ultrasound screening for detection of fetal structural anomalies and factors that affect screening performance.
Karim JN; Roberts NW; Salomon LJ; Papageorghiou AT
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 50(4):429-441. PubMed ID: 27546497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of routine obstetric ultrasonographic screening in a low-risk population.
Skupski DW; Newman S; Edersheim T; Hutson JM; Udom-Rice I; Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Nov; 175(5):1142-5. PubMed ID: 8942479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The value of mid-trimester routine ultrasonographic screening in antenatal detection of congenital malformations.
Pitukkijronnakorn S; Chittacharoen A; Jetsawangsri T; Panburana P; Jaovisidha A; Roungsipragarn R; Saropala N; Herabutya Y
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Jun; 92(6):748-53. PubMed ID: 19530579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Routine ultrasound screening and detection of congenital anomalies outside a university setting.
Nakling J; Backe B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Nov; 84(11):1042-8. PubMed ID: 16232170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive value of antepartum ultrasound examination for anomalies in twin gestations.
Edwards MS; Ellings JM; Newman RB; Menard MK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jul; 6(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 8528801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity and specificity of routine antenatal screening for congenital anomalies by ultrasound: the Belgian Multicentric Study.
Levi S; Hyjazi Y; Schaapst JP; Defoort P; Coulon R; Buekens P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Mar; 1(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 12797083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Routine screening for fetal anomalies: expectations.
Goldberg JD
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2004 Mar; 31(1):35-50. PubMed ID: 15062446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The evolution of prenatal screening and diagnosis and its impact on an unselected population over an 18-year period.
Boyd PA; Rounding C; Chamberlain P; Wellesley D; Kurinczuk JJ
BJOG; 2012 Aug; 119(9):1131-40. PubMed ID: 22676508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Early fetal anomaly scanning in a population at increased risk of abnormalities.
den Hollander NS; Wessels MW; Niermeijer MF; Los FJ; Wladimiroff JW
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 19(6):570-4. PubMed ID: 12047536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
