These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9754115)
1. Gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted imaging of the head and neck: comparison of gradient and conventional SE sequences. Hirsch JA; Loevner LA; Yousem DM; Siegelman ES; Keiper MD; Marquis RP; Grossman RI J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(5):771-6. PubMed ID: 9754115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging. Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images. Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast-enhanced radial 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo sequence versus conventional fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted studies of the head and neck. Wu X; Raz E; Block TK; Geppert C; Hagiwara M; Bruno MT; Fatterpekar GM AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):883-9. PubMed ID: 25247956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging vs spin-echo MR imaging, CT, and cholangiography. Low RN; Sigeti JS; Francis IR; Weinman D; Bower B; Shimakawa A; Foo TK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 8310918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conspicuity of tumors of the head and neck on fat-suppressed MR images: T2-weighted fast-spin-echo versus contrast-enhanced T1-weighted conventional spin-echo sequences. Dubin MD; Teresi LM; Bradley WG; Jordan JE; Pema PJ; Goergen SK; Tam JK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1213-21. PubMed ID: 7717234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT. Low RN; Francis IR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MR imaging of the brain: comparison of gradient-echo and spin-echo pulse sequences. Pui MH; Fok EC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):959-62. PubMed ID: 7677001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted Head and Neck MRI: Prospective Intraindividual Image Quality Comparison of Spiral GRE, Cartesian GRE, and Cartesian TSE Sequences. Sartoretti E; Sartoretti-Schefer S; van Smoorenburg L; Binkert CA; Schwenk Á; Gutzeit A; Mannil M; Wyss M; Sartoretti T AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jan; 218(1):132-139. PubMed ID: 34406050 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abdominal MR imaging: comparison of T2-weighted fast and conventional spin-echo, and contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging. Low RN; Francis IR; Sigeti JS; Foo TK Radiology; 1993 Mar; 186(3):803-11. PubMed ID: 8430191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-enhanced volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination compared with spin-echo T1-weighted imaging of head and neck tumors. Kataoka M; Ueda H; Koyama T; Umeoka S; Togashi K; Asato R; Tanaka S; Ito J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):313-9. PubMed ID: 15615994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fat-suppressed, three-dimensional T1-weighted imaging using high-acceleration parallel acquisition and a dual-echo Dixon technique for gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI at 3 T. Yoon JH; Lee JM; Yu MH; Kim EJ; Han JK; Choi BI Acta Radiol; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1454-62. PubMed ID: 25480475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MR dynamic Gadolinium-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-echo and spin-echo T1-weighted fat-suppressed techniques in diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. Zeng MS; Yan FH; Zhou KR; Chen ZW; Sun JZ; Chen CZ; Shi WB Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2002 May; 1(2):294-8. PubMed ID: 14612288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can a multiphasic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence be sufficient for liver MR imaging? Coulam CH; Chan FP; Li KC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 11804888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of in-phase and opposed-phase GRE and conventional SE MR pulse sequences in T1-weighted imaging of liver lesions. Martín J; Sentis M; Puig J; Rué M; Falcó J; Donoso L; Zidan A J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1996; 20(6):890-7. PubMed ID: 8933787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic contrast-enhanced FMPSPGR of the pancreas: impact on diagnostic performance. Göhde SC; Toth J; Krestin GP; Debatin JF AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Mar; 168(3):689-96. PubMed ID: 9057517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation of clinical, surgical, pathologic, and MR fat suppression results for head and neck cancer. Tien RD; Robbins KT Head Neck; 1992; 14(4):278-84. PubMed ID: 1325416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discrimination between fluid, synovium, and cartilage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: contrast enhanced Spin Echo versus non-contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed Gradient Echo MR imaging. Rand T; Imhof H; Czerny C; Breitenseher M; Machold K; Turetschek K; Trattnig S Clin Radiol; 1999 Feb; 54(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 10050739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]