These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 975414)

  • 1. Experience with the Saf - T - Coil.
    Gunaratne M
    Ceylon Med J; 1976 Mar; 21(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 975414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Florida's experience with an intrauterine device for the nulliparous patients.
    Caraway AF
    J Reprod Med; 1975 Sep; 15(3):114-6. PubMed ID: 1214252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tatum T: experience with 3,000 patients.
    Williamson HO; Bank HL; Kirkland BH
    Adv Plan Parent; 1975; 10(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 789154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Experience with the T-CU 200 and 300 intrauterine devices].
    Fugère P; Girard Y; Lemay M
    Union Med Can; 1976 Nov; 105(11):1717-20. PubMed ID: 982699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A fluid-filled intrauterine device: initial clinical trials.
    Margolis AJ; Mackay HT
    Adv Plan Parent; 1975; 9(3-4):11-5. PubMed ID: 1164992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of intrauterine devices: ninth progress report of the Cooperative Statistical Program.
    Tietze C
    Stud Fam Plann; 1970 Jul; (55):1-40. PubMed ID: 5538466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. One-year evaluation of the Spring Coil IUD in Rijeka, Yugoslavia, and Cairo, Egypt.
    Randic L; Ragab I; Thomas M; Kessel E; Bernard RP
    Adv Plan Parent; 1975; 10(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 1234074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of copper-7 intrauterine device in Malaysian women.
    Sivanesaratnam V; Puvan IS; Sinnathuray TA
    Med J Aust; 1975 Aug; 2(8):298-301. PubMed ID: 1165736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Effectiveness, complications and failures of the Spiran-type intrauterine device].
    Horoszko-Husiatyńska B; Peterek J
    Wiad Lek; 1980 Feb; 33(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 7395200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experience with a modified small size Ypsilon.
    Soichet S; Rodrigues W; Cederqvist L
    Adv Plan Parent; 1975; 10(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 1164983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Two years use of IUD copper T 200].
    Cohen J; Viollet MR
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1975 Oct; 3(6):373-6. PubMed ID: 1222844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The use of intrauterine devices].
    Ahued Ahued JR; Sangines Martínez A; Okhysen Cerda KC; Pineda Guerrero E
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1982 Jul; 50(303):197-200. PubMed ID: 7182235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evaluation from various viewpoints of the Lippes Loop, Multiload Cu 250 and Nova T].
    Bilgin S; Deger S; Ariduru F
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1988; 110(14):893-8. PubMed ID: 3176743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intrauterine contraception with the Antigon-F device.
    Cederqvist LL; Lauersen NH; Donovan S; Fuchs F
    Adv Plan Parent; 1975; 10(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 1164984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinical study of a copper IUD, T Cu 200].
    Viollet MF; Cohen J; Merger R
    Gynecologie; 1975 Jan; 26(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 1095434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Clinical study of the copper intrauterine T contraceptive device].
    Rustrián Azamar A
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1976 Sep; 40(239):207-9. PubMed ID: 976763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experience with the Saf-T-Coil.
    Cheatham GR; Bowden RH; Young CM
    Rocky Mt Med J; 1967 Jul; 64(7):49-51. PubMed ID: 6045933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The Monterrey IUD. A retrospective view].
    García-Flores RF
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1983 Sep; 51(317):249-52. PubMed ID: 6681309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [6-year analysis of the use of the intrauterine device].
    Hofmann R
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1987; 81(6):281-4. PubMed ID: 3617809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Migration of an intrauterine device after salpingectomy. Translocation of an in situ intrauterine device to the abdominal cavity after tubal pregnancy and salpingectomy].
    Trolle C; Sommer W
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1987 Apr; 107(12):1029, 1036. PubMed ID: 3603456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.