266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9754393)
1. Coming in first.
Ortolon K
Tex Med; 1997 Sep; 93(9):26-30. PubMed ID: 9754393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Texas Health Care Liability Act: Texas is the first state to listen to the concerns of its health care consumers, but how much has it heard?
McCabe KM
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2000; 16(2):565-95. PubMed ID: 10970185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Groping for the reins: ERISA, HMO malpractice, and enterprise liability.
Kilcullen JK
Am J Law Med; 1996; 22(1):7-50. PubMed ID: 8819595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The people vs HMOs.
Howe RF
Time; 1999 Feb; 153(4):46-7. PubMed ID: 10345773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A court muddies the water for HMO liability.
Guglielmo WJ
Med Econ; 1999 Jan; 76(1):41. PubMed ID: 10351080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Time for reckoning ... Wall Street wasn't interested in healthcare because it had not yet become big business.
Hage SJ
Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(6):25-6. PubMed ID: 10338851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Health plan liability.
Coleman D
Healthplan; 1997; 38(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 10176856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Texas breaks new ground.
Moran T
Tex Med; 1998 Dec; 94(12):58-61. PubMed ID: 9854419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Law & psychiatry: Pegram v. Herdrich: the Supreme Court passes the buck on managed care.
Appelbaum PS
Psychiatr Serv; 2000 Oct; 51(10):1225-6, 1238. PubMed ID: 11013317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Evolving tension between HMO liability precedent and legislation.
Mansfield NR; Gabel JT; Jablow LB
Tort Insur Law J; 2001; 36(4):949-78. PubMed ID: 11939226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Vicarious liability: is ERISA preemption a successful defense?
Lederberg MB
Med Health R I; 1997 Feb; 80(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 9046780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Mining a new legal theory.
Moran T
Tex Med; 1999 Feb; 95(2):28-30. PubMed ID: 10025178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The law that shields HMOs from the risk doctors face.
Coleman DL
Manag Care; 1997 May; 6(5):25-6, 35-8, 41. PubMed ID: 10168633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Preemption of a state "legislatively created" right to sue HMOs for negligence. Corporate Health Ins. Inc. v. Texas Dept. of Insurance.
Jordan KA
Health Care Law Mon; 1999 Apr; ():13-24. PubMed ID: 10351769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. ERISA preemption: will the elimination of the ERISA preemption clause help or harm America's ability to deal with its pending health care crisis?
Taylor DH
J Law Health; 1999-2000; 14(1):133-78. PubMed ID: 11187365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. What recourse? Liability for managed-care decisions and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Mariner WK
N Engl J Med; 2000 Aug; 343(8):592-6. PubMed ID: 10954770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The changing world of HMO liability under ERISA.
McAuliffe BE
J Leg Med; 2001 Mar; 22(1):77-106. PubMed ID: 11330125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Will Fifth Circuit's decision spur action on patient rights?
Levin-Epstein M
Manag Care; 2000 Aug; 9(8):14-5. PubMed ID: 11186509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Workers of the world, panic!
Parloff R
Fortune; 2004 Jul; 150(1):36, 38. PubMed ID: 15270460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. ERISA. Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10628447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
