These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9755034)

  • 1. Axial stiffness of human lumbar motion segments, force dependence.
    Rostedt M; Ekström L; Broman H; Hansson T
    J Biomech; 1998 Jun; 31(6):503-9. PubMed ID: 9755034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of strain rate on the compressive stiffness properties of human lumbar intervertebral discs.
    Kemper AR; McNally C; Duma SM
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2007; 43():176-81. PubMed ID: 17487077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement and analysis of the in vivo posteroanterior impulse response of the human thoracolumbar spine: a feasibility study.
    Nathan M; Keller TS
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1994 Sep; 17(7):431-41. PubMed ID: 7989876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Load transfer characteristics between posterior spinal implants and the lumbar spine under anterior shear loading: an in vitro investigation.
    Melnyk AD; Wen TL; Kingwell S; Chak JD; Singh V; Cripton PA; Fisher CG; Dvorak MF; Oxland TR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Aug; 37(18):E1126-33. PubMed ID: 22565384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of cancellous bone density on load sharing in human lumbar spine: a comparison between an intact and a surgically altered motion segment.
    Pitzen T; Geisler FH; Matthis D; Müller-Storz H; Pedersen K; Steudel WI
    Eur Spine J; 2001 Feb; 10(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 11276832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The stiffness of lumbar spinal motion segments with a high-intensity zone in the anulus fibrosus.
    Schmidt TA; An HS; Lim TH; Nowicki BH; Haughton VM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Oct; 23(20):2167-73. PubMed ID: 9802156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of large compression loads on lumbar spine in flexion and in torsion using a novel wrapping element.
    Shirazi-Adl A
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 16321628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Calibration of hyperelastic material properties of the human lumbar intervertebral disc under fast dynamic compressive loads.
    Wagnac E; Arnoux PJ; Garo A; El-Rich M; Aubin CE
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Oct; 133(10):101007. PubMed ID: 22070332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bending stiffness of the lumbar spine subjected to posteroanterior manipulative force.
    Lee RY; Tsung BY; Tong P; Evans J
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 15944881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The dynamic flexion/extension properties of the lumbar spine in vitro using a novel pendulum system.
    Crisco JJ; Fujita L; Spenciner DB
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(12):2767-73. PubMed ID: 17367798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shear strength of the human lumbar spine.
    Skrzypiec DM; Klein A; Bishop NE; Stahmer F; Püschel K; Seidel H; Morlock MM; Huber G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Aug; 27(7):646-51. PubMed ID: 22578739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic stiffness and damping of human intervertebral disc using axial oscillatory displacement under a free mass system.
    Izambert O; Mitton D; Thourot M; Lavaste F
    Eur Spine J; 2003 Dec; 12(6):562-6. PubMed ID: 14605972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can extra-articular strains be used to measure facet contact forces in the lumbar spine? An in-vitro biomechanical study.
    Zhu QA; Park YB; Sjovold SG; Niosi CA; Wilson DC; Cripton PA; Oxland TR
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Feb; 222(2):171-84. PubMed ID: 18441753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Motion segment stiffness measured without physiological levels of axial compressive preload underestimates the in vivo values in all six degrees of freedom.
    Gardner-Morse MG; Stokes IA; Churchill D; Badger G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():167-72. PubMed ID: 15457717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quasi-static and dynamic properties of the intervertebral disc: experimental study and model parameter determination for the porcine lumbar motion segment.
    Araújo ÂR; Peixinho N; Pinho AC; Claro JC
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2015; 17(4):59-66. PubMed ID: 26900017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A study on the structural properties of the lumbar endplate: histological structure, the effect of bone density, and spinal level.
    Hou Y; Luo Z
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):E427-33. PubMed ID: 19454994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physiological axial compressive preloads increase motion segment stiffness, linearity and hysteresis in all six degrees of freedom for small displacements about the neutral posture.
    Gardner-Morse MG; Stokes IA
    J Orthop Res; 2003 May; 21(3):547-52. PubMed ID: 12706030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variation of lumbar spine stiffness with load.
    Edwards WT; Hayes WC; Posner I; White AA; Mann RW
    J Biomech Eng; 1987 Feb; 109(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 3560877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vivo dynamic stiffness of the porcine lumbar spine exposed to cyclic loading: influence of load and degeneration.
    Kaigle A; Ekström L; Holm S; Rostedt M; Hansson T
    J Spinal Disord; 1998 Feb; 11(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 9493772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical effects of disc degeneration and hybrid fixation on the transition and adjacent lumbar segments: trade-off between junctional problem, motion preservation, and load protection.
    Chuang WH; Lin SC; Chen SH; Wang CW; Tsai WC; Chen YJ; Hwang JR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Nov; 37(24):E1488-97. PubMed ID: 22872225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.