These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 975514)

  • 1. Proficiency testing for blood-gas quality control.
    Delaney CJ; Leary ET; Raisys VA; Kenny MA
    Clin Chem; 1976 Oct; 22(10):1675-84. PubMed ID: 975514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Blood gas quality control materials compared to tonometered blood in examining for interinstrument bias in PO2.
    Hansen JE; Feil MC
    Chest; 1988 Jul; 94(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 3383656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of blood gas analyzer biases in measuring tonometered blood and a fluorocarbon-containing, proficiency-testing material.
    Hansen JE; Jensen RL; Casaburi R; Crapo RO
    Am Rev Respir Dis; 1989 Aug; 140(2):403-9. PubMed ID: 2504088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interinstitutional comparison of bedside blood glucose monitoring program characteristics, accuracy performance, and quality control documentation: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of bedside blood glucose monitoring performed in 226 small hospitals.
    Novis DA; Jones BA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):495-502. PubMed ID: 9625416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Commercially available blood-gas quality controls compared with tonometered blood.
    Leary ET; Graham G; Kenny MA
    Clin Chem; 1980 Aug; 26(9):1309-16. PubMed ID: 7398045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patterns of dissimilarities among instrument models in measuring PO2, PCO2, and pH in blood gas laboratories.
    Hansen JE; Casaburi R
    Chest; 1998 Mar; 113(3):780-7. PubMed ID: 9515857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Utilizing global data to estimate analytical performance on the Sigma scale: A global comparative analysis of methods, instruments, and manufacturers through external quality assurance and proficiency testing programs.
    Westgard SA
    Clin Biochem; 2016 Jun; 49(9):699-707. PubMed ID: 26948097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance evaluation of a blood gas system in a central and satellite laboratory.
    Menendez-Botet CJ; Koller NE; La Monte CS; Schwartz MK
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 1979; 9(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 464544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Matrix effects in blood gas proficiency testing.
    Burnett RW
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr; 117(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 8466398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ability of the 1(2)s rule to detect substandard performance in interlaboratory proficiency testing.
    Ehrmeyer SS; Laessig RH
    Clin Chem; 1987 Jun; 33(6):788-91. PubMed ID: 3594815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proficiency testing materials for pH and blood gases. The California Thoracic Society experience.
    Hansen JE; Clausen JL; Levy SE; Mohler JG; Van Kessel AL
    Chest; 1986 Feb; 89(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 3943381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of the Kodak DT-60 physician's office analyzer as measured by CLIA-88 proposed evaluation criteria. Assessment of demographic and quality assurance factors influencing performance.
    Meier S; Ehrmeyer S; Laessig R; Woodlief G; Lanphear B; Hassemer D
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 May; 116(5):524-30. PubMed ID: 1580758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Participant responses to blood gas proficiency testing reports.
    Hansen JE
    Chest; 1992 May; 101(5):1240-4. PubMed ID: 1582278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of the performance of blood gas analysis in the UK using tonometered haemolysate material.
    Thomas MA
    Clin Chim Acta; 2001 May; 307(1-2):125-33. PubMed ID: 11369347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of blood gas quality control and proficiency testing materials by tonometry.
    Hansen JE; Stone ME; Ong ST; Van Kessel AL
    Am Rev Respir Dis; 1982 Apr; 125(4):480-3. PubMed ID: 7073119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of variations in room temperature on measured values of blood gas quality-control materials.
    Ong ST; David D; Snow M; Hansen JE
    Clin Chem; 1983 Mar; 29(3):502-5. PubMed ID: 6825263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preliminary performance evaluation of blood gas analyzers.
    Couck P; Ghys T; Van Gastel E; Van Coillie M; Gorus F; Gerlo E
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(8):1030-4. PubMed ID: 16879073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The ATS proficiency testing program for blood gas laboratories.
    Van Kessel AL
    CVP; 1983; 11(3):41, 44-5. PubMed ID: 10260740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Saline PCO2 is an important source of error in the assessment of gastric intramucosal pH.
    Takala J; Parviainen I; Siloaho M; Ruokonen E; Hämäläinen E
    Crit Care Med; 1994 Nov; 22(11):1877-9. PubMed ID: 7956295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reduced bovine hemoglobin solution evaluated for use as a blood gas quality-control material.
    Mahoney JJ; Wong RJ; Van Kessel AL
    Clin Chem; 1993 May; 39(5):874-9. PubMed ID: 8485880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.