These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 975514)
21. [The pilot program in Mexican clinical laboratories. III. The strategy for evaluating the quality of the results]. de Gortari E; Herrera M; Loría A; Terrés A; González-Salayandia MA; Hernández MA Salud Publica Mex; 1994; 36(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 7892623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy and precision of point-of-care testing for glucose and prothrombin time at the critical care units. Yuoh C; Tarek Elghetany M; Petersen JR; Mohammad A; Okorodudu AO Clin Chim Acta; 2001 May; 307(1-2):119-23. PubMed ID: 11369346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Permanent clinical chemistry program of the National Institutes of Health. II. Sources of variation in 2 imprecise analyzers]. Loría A; Rosas-Baruch A; Moreno J; Villaviencio-Ferral P; Rojas L Rev Invest Clin; 1994; 46(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 8079063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Performance of asbestos fiber counting laboratories in the NIOSH proficiency analytical testing (PAT) program. Schlecht PC; Shulman SA Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1986 May; 47(5):259-69. PubMed ID: 3012990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Analytical performance evaluation of four cartridge-type blood gas analyzers. De Koninck AS; De Decker K; Van Bocxlaer J; Meeus P; Van Hoovels L Clin Chem Lab Med; 2012 Feb; 50(6):1083-91. PubMed ID: 22706251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Lessons from the organization of a proficiency testing program in food microbiology by interlaboratory comparison: analytical methods in use, impact of methods on bacterial counts and measurement uncertainty of bacterial counts. Augustin JC; Carlier V Food Microbiol; 2006 Feb; 23(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 16942983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Use of computer modeling to predict the magnitude of intralaboratory error tolerated by proposed CDC interlaboratory proficiency testing performance criteria. Laessig RH; Ehrmeyer SS Clin Chem; 1988 Sep; 34(9):1849-53. PubMed ID: 2843307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessing precision and accuracy in blood gas proficiency testing. Hansen JE; Casaburi R; Crapo RO; Jensen RL Am Rev Respir Dis; 1990 May; 141(5 Pt 1):1190-3. PubMed ID: 2111104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Inter-instrument comparison of blood gas analyzers and assessment of tonometry using fresh heparinized whole human blood. Van Kessel AL; Eichhorn JH; Clausen JL; Stone ME; Rotman HH; Crapo RO Chest; 1987 Sep; 92(3):418-22. PubMed ID: 3622021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. European specifications for imprecision and inaccuracy compared with operating specifications that assure the quality required by US CLIA proficiency-testing criteria. Westgard JO; Seehafer JJ; Barry PL Clin Chem; 1994 Jul; 40(7 Pt 1):1228-32. PubMed ID: 8013091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Multisite evaluation of a continuous intraarterial blood gas monitoring system. Larson CP; Vender J; Seiver A Anesthesiology; 1994 Sep; 81(3):543-52. PubMed ID: 8092498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessment of recently developed blood gas analysers: a multicentre evaluation. Gouget B; Gourmelin Y; Feuillu A; Blanchet F; Capolaghi B; Lagente M; Lardet G; Manceaux JC; Truchaud A J Automat Chem; 1989; 11(6):266-72. PubMed ID: 18925254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of blood gas, electrolyte and metabolite results measured with two different blood gas analyzers and a core laboratory analyzer. Uyanik M; Sertoglu E; Kayadibi H; Tapan S; Serdar MA; Bilgi C; Kurt I Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2015 Apr; 75(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 25431133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of a new reagent for preserving fresh blood samples and its potential usefulness for internal quality controls of multichannel hematology analyzers. Springer W; Prohaska W; Neukammer J; Höpe A; von Ruecker A Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Mar; 111(3):387-96. PubMed ID: 10078115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Hand-held blood gas analyzer is accurate in the critical care setting. Zaloga GP; Roberts PR; Black K; Santamauro JT; Klase E; Suleiman M Crit Care Med; 1996 Jun; 24(6):957-62. PubMed ID: 8681598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Creatinine measurement proficiency testing: assignment of matrix-adjusted ID GC-MS target values. Carobene A; Ferrero C; Ceriotti F; Modenese A; Besozzi M; de Giorgi E; Franzin M; Franzini C; Kienle MG; Magni F Clin Chem; 1997 Aug; 43(8 Pt 1):1342-7. PubMed ID: 9267311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]