These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9755670)

  • 21. Cost analysis of PAPNET-assisted vs. conventional Pap smear evaluation in primary screening of cervical smears.
    Meerding WJ; Doornewaard H; van Ballegooijen M; Bos A; van der Graaf Y; van den Tweel JG; van der Schouw YT; Habbema JD
    Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 11213501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Potentially difficult smears of women with squamous cell carcinoma pose fewer problems when PAPNET is used for primary screening.
    Kok MR; Schreiner-Kok PG; Van Der Veen G; Boon ME
    Cytopathology; 1999 Oct; 10(5):324-34. PubMed ID: 10588351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Simulation of primary cervical cancer screening by the PAPNET system in an unscreened, high-risk community.
    Michelow PM; Hlongwane NF; Leiman G
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 9022732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The ASCUS : SIL ratio and the reference laboratory pathologist.
    Wachtel MS; Dahm PF
    Cytopathology; 2003 Oct; 14(5):249-56. PubMed ID: 14510888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of automated primary screening on PAPNET of cervical smears in the PRISMATIC trial. PRISMATIC Project Management Team.
    Lancet; 1999 Apr; 353(9162):1381-5. PubMed ID: 10227217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. PAPNET-assisted primary screening of conventional cervical smears.
    Cenci M; Nagar C; Vecchione A
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3887-9. PubMed ID: 11268471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of PAPNET system for rescreening of negative cervical smears.
    Ashfaq R; Liang Y; Saboorian MH
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1995 Jul; 13(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7587873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Automated screening for quality control using PAPNET: a study of 638 negative Pap smears.
    Keyhani-Rofagha S; Palma T; O'Toole RV
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jun; 14(4):316-20. PubMed ID: 8725131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Determination of features indicating progression in atypical squamous cells with undetermined significance: human papillomavirus typing and DNA ploidy analysis from liquid-based cytologic samples.
    Bollmann R; Méhes G; Torka R; Speich N; Schmitt C; Bollmann M
    Cancer; 2003 Apr; 99(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 12704691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Evaluation of cytological screening for cancers and precancerous lesions of the cervix].
    Boman F; Duhamel A; Trinh QD; Deken V; Leroy JL; Beuscart R
    Bull Cancer; 2003 Jul; 90(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 12957806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The diagnostic value of computer-assisted primary cervical smear screening: a longitudinal cohort study.
    Doornewaard H; van der Schouw YT; van der Graaf Y; Bos AB; Habbema JD; van den Tweel JG
    Mod Pathol; 1999 Nov; 12(11):995-1000. PubMed ID: 10574595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Computer-assisted primary screening of cervical smears using the PAPNET method: comparison with conventional screening and evaluation of the role of the cytologist.
    Ouwerkerk-Noordam E; Boon ME; Beck S
    Cytopathology; 1994 Aug; 5(4):211-8. PubMed ID: 7948757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Risk of precancer and follow-up management strategies for women with human papillomavirus-negative atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
    Safaeian M; Solomon D; Wacholder S; Schiffman M; Castle P
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1325-31. PubMed ID: 17540804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Liquid-based cytology and conventional cervical smears: a comparison study in an Asian screening population.
    Cheung AN; Szeto EF; Leung BS; Khoo US; Ng AW
    Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):331-5. PubMed ID: 14681939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy comparison between PAPNET diagnoses and conventional diagnoses in an Italian cervical cytology laboratory.
    Ghidoni D; Fabbris E; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Medri M; Bucchi L; Bondi A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Oct; 19(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9784992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Oral contraceptive pills are associated with artifacts in ThinPrep Pap smears that mimic low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
    Morrison C; Prokorym P; Piquero C; Wakely PE; Nuovo GJ
    Cancer; 2003 Apr; 99(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 12704686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Detection of unsuspected abnormalities by PAPNET-assisted review.
    Mitchell H; Medley G
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):260-4. PubMed ID: 9479349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Significant reduction in the rate of false-negative cervical smears with neural network-based technology (PAPNET Testing System).
    Koss LG; Sherman ME; Cohen MB; Anes AR; Darragh TM; Lemos LB; McClellan BJ; Rosenthal DL; Keyhani-Rofagha S; Schreiber K; Valente PT
    Hum Pathol; 1997 Oct; 28(10):1196-203. PubMed ID: 9343327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Evaluation of PAPNET--a semiautomated system used in the screening against cervical cancer].
    Hølund B; Ejersbo D; Hjortebjerg A
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Sep; 160(40):5802-6. PubMed ID: 9782761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of Papnet-assisted and manual screening of cervical smears.
    Losell K; Dejmek A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Oct; 21(4):296-9. PubMed ID: 10495327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.