326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9756699)
1. Buffer zones for reducing pesticide drift to ditches and risks to aquatic organisms.
de Snoo GR; de Wit PJ
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1998 Sep; 41(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 9756699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Buffer zone and windbreak effects on spray drift deposition in a simulated wetland.
Brown RB; Carter MH; Stephenson GR
Pest Manag Sci; 2004 Nov; 60(11):1085-90. PubMed ID: 15532682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pesticide buffer zones for the protection of wildlife.
Burn A
Pest Manag Sci; 2003 May; 59(5):583-90. PubMed ID: 12741527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spray drift as affected by meteorological conditions.
Nuyttens D; Sonck B; de Schampheleire M; Steurbaut W; Baetens K; Verboven P; Nicolaï B; Ramon H
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):947-59. PubMed ID: 16628942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Occurrence of spray drift for different crop types: cereal, cereal stubble and grassland.
De Schampheleire M; Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; Verboven P; Spanoghe P
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 19226823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The assessment of spray drift damage for ten major crops in Belgium.
de Schampheleire M; Spanoghe P; Steurbaut W; Nuyttens D; Sonck B
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):1037-42. PubMed ID: 16628952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 4: a comparative study.
Nuyttens D; Baetens K; De Schampheleire M; Sonck B
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):769-74. PubMed ID: 19226827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of the entrained air and initial droplet velocity on the release height parameter of a Gaussian spray drift model.
Stainier C; Destain MF; Schiffers B; Lebeau F
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):197-200. PubMed ID: 17390793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimated nationwide effects of pesticide spray drift on terrestrial habitats in the Netherlands.
de Jong FM; de Snoo GR; van de Zande JC
J Environ Manage; 2008 Mar; 86(4):721-30. PubMed ID: 17280762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Drift studies--comparison of field and wind tunnel experiments.
Stadler R; Regenauer W
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):971-3. PubMed ID: 16628944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simulation of drift of pesticides: development and validation of a model.
Brusselman E; Spanoghe P; Van der Meeren P; Gabriels D; Steurbaut W
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2003; 68(4 Pt B):749-58. PubMed ID: 15151311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of realtime spray drift using RTDrift Gaussian advection-diffusion model.
Lebeau F; Verstraete A; Schiffers B; Destain MF
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 20218507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ecological impact in ditch mesocosms of simulated spray drift from a crop protection program for potatoes.
Arts GH; Buijse-Bogdan LL; Belgers JD; van Rhenen-Kersten CH; van Wijngaarden RP; Roessink I; Maund SJ; van den Brink PJ; Brockt TC
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Apr; 2(2):105-25. PubMed ID: 16646380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Classification of spray nozzles based on droplet size distributions and wind tunnel tests.
De Schamphelerie M; Spanoghe P; Nuyttens D; Baetens K; Cornelis W; Gabriels D; Van der Meeren P
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):201-7. PubMed ID: 17390794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 3: field drift experiments.
Nuyttens D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Dekeyser D; Sonck B
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):763-7. PubMed ID: 19226826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of air support on droplet characteristics and spray drift.
Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Sonck B
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2007; 72(2):71-9. PubMed ID: 18399426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigation on downwind short-range transport of pesticides after application in agricultural crops.
Siebers J; Binner R; Wittich KP
Chemosphere; 2003 May; 51(5):397-407. PubMed ID: 12598005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of natural windbreaks on drift reduction in orchard spraying.
Wenneker M; Heijne B; van de Zande JC
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):961-9. PubMed ID: 16628943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative ecological risks of pesticides used in plantation production of papaya: application of the SYNOPS indicator.
Hernández-Hernández CN; Valle-Mora J; Santiesteban-Hernández A; Bello-Mendoza R
Sci Total Environ; 2007 Aug; 381(1-3):112-25. PubMed ID: 17482661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interception of spray drift by border structures. Part 1: wind tunnel experiments.
De Schampheleire M; Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; Verboven P; Cornelis W; Gabriels D; Spanoghe P
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):719-22. PubMed ID: 19226819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
