91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9757199)
1. [Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in advanced ovarian cancer].
Terasawa K; Sagae S; Mizumoto H; Iwasaki M; Kudo R
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1998 Sep; 25(11):1731-7. PubMed ID: 9757199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Study on peripheral blood stem cells mobilized by different chemotherapies with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in ovarian cancer].
Hiura M; Murakami J; Shigemasa K; Fujioka T; Yokoyama T; Nogawa T; Chiba T; Shimokawa T
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Mar; 47(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 7535329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Superior autologous blood stem cell mobilization from dose-intensive cyclophosphamide, etoposide, cisplatin plus G-CSF than from less intensive chemotherapy regimens.
Stewart DA; Guo D; Morris D; Poon MC; Ruether BA; Jones AR; Klassen J; Auer I; Luider J; Chaudhry A; Brown C; Russell JA
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Jan; 23(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 10197794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: a randomized comparison of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim.
Weaver CH; Schulman KA; Buckner CD
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2001 May; 27 Suppl 2():S23-9. PubMed ID: 11436117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficient mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following CAD chemotherapy and a single dose of pegylated G-CSF in patients with multiple myeloma.
Fruehauf S; Klaus J; Huesing J; Veldwijk MR; Buss EC; Topaly J; Seeger T; Zeller LW; Moehler T; Ho AD; Goldschmidt H
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2007 Jun; 39(12):743-50. PubMed ID: 17450182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.
Arora M; Burns LJ; Barker JN; Miller JS; Defor TE; Olujohungbe AB; Weisdorf DJ
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2004 Jun; 10(6):395-404. PubMed ID: 15148493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) after etoposide, adriamycin and cisplatin therapy, and a multimodal cell therapy approach with PBSCs in advanced gastric cancer.
Ueda Y; Sonoda Y; Fujiki H; Harada S; Kimura T; Itoh T; Imura K; Naito K; Nomura K; Taniwaki M; Yamagishi H
Oncol Rep; 2004 Aug; 12(2):323-32. PubMed ID: 15254697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recombinant human granulocyte and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF and GM-CSF) administered following cytotoxic chemotherapy have a similar ability to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells.
Hohaus S; Martin H; Wassmann B; Egerer G; Haus U; Färber L; Burger KJ; Goldschmidt H; Hoelzer D; Haas R
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1998 Oct; 22(7):625-30. PubMed ID: 9818688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-dose ifosfamide and etoposide with filgrastim for stem cell mobilization in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
Donato ML; Gershenson D; Ippoliti C; Wharton JT; Bast RC; Aleman A; Anderlini P; Gajewski JG; Giralt S; Molldrem J; Ueno N; Lauppe J; Korbling M; Boyer J; Bodurka-Bevers D; Bevers M; Burke T; Freedman R; Levenback C; Wolf J; Champlin RE
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2000 Jun; 25(11):1137-40. PubMed ID: 10849525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose-intense paclitaxel, etoposide and cyclophosphamide: a safe and active regimen for tumor cytoreduction and stem cell mobilization in metastatic breast cancer.
Bilgrami S; Feingold JM; Bona RD; Edwards RL; Khan AM; Rodriguez-Pinero F; Khan IA; Kazierad D; Clive J; Tutschka PJ
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2000 Jan; 25(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10673668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mobilization strategies for the collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells: Results from a pilot study of delayed addition G-CSF following chemotherapy and review of the literature.
Jacoub JF; Suryadevara U; Pereyra V; Colón D; Fontelonga A; Mackintosh FR; Hall SW; Ascensão JL
Exp Hematol; 2006 Nov; 34(11):1443-50. PubMed ID: 17046563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ESHAP plus G-CSF as an effective peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization regimen in pretreated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: comparison with high-dose cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF.
Lee JL; Kim S; Kim SW; Kim EK; Kim SB; Kang YK; Lee J; Kim MW; Park CJ; Chi HS; Huh J; Kim SH; Suh C
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2005 Mar; 35(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 15654353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Autologous peripheral blood stem cells mobilization with etoposide plus rhG-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus rhG-CSF].
Shi YK; He XH; Han XH; Liu P; Yang JL; Zhou SY; Zhou AP; Zhang CG; Ai B
Ai Zheng; 2003 Dec; 22(12):1311-6. PubMed ID: 14693058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-dose sequential epirubicin and cyclophosphamide with peripheral blood stem cell support for advanced breast cancer: results of a phase II study.
Cottu PH; Extra JM; Espie M; Marolleau JP; de Roquancourt A; Makke J; Miclea JM; Laurence V; Mayeur D; Lerebours F; Cuvier C; Marty M
Br J Cancer; 2001 Nov; 85(9):1240-6. PubMed ID: 11720455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combination chemotherapy containing mitoguazone, ifosfamide, methotrexate, etoposide (MIME) and G-CSF efficiently mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells in heavily pre-treated relapsed lymphoma patients.
Aurlien E; Holte H; Kvaløy S; Jakobsen E; Rusten LS; Kvalheim G
Eur J Haematol Suppl; 2001 Jul; 64():14-20. PubMed ID: 11486395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stem cell factor leads to reduced blood processing during apheresis or the use of whole blood aliquots to support dose-intensive chemotherapy.
Weaver A; Testa NG
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1998 Jul; 22(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9678793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ESHAP and G-CSF is a superior blood stem cell mobilizing regimen compared to cyclophosphamide 1.5 g m(-2) and G-CSF for pre-treated lymphoma patients: a matched pairs analysis of 78 patients.
Watts MJ; Ings SJ; Leverett D; MacMillan A; Devereux S; Goldstone AH; Linch DC
Br J Cancer; 2000 Jan; 82(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 10646877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mobilization kinetics of peripheral blood progenitor cells after IAPVP-16 salvage chemotherapy plus G-CSF in lymphoproliferative disorders.
Altés A; López R; Martino R; Martinez C; Cabezudo E; Muñoz L; Santamaría A; Perea G; Briones J; Salar A; Sureda A; Brunet S; Madoz P; Sierra J
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2000 Jul; 26(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 10918421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with breast cancer: a prospective randomized trial comparing rhG-CSF with the combination of rhG-CSF plus rhEpo after VIP-E chemotherapy.
Waller CF; von Lintig F; Daskalakis A; Musahl V; Lange W
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Jul; 24(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 10435729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Etoposide 1.0 g/m2 or 1.5 g/m2 combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with malignancy: efficacy and toxicity.
Li B; Yang JL; Shi YK; He XH; Han XH; Zhou SY; Liu P; Yang S; Zhang CG
Cytotherapy; 2009; 11(3):362-71. PubMed ID: 19037766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
