201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9757210)
1. [TNM classification: cancer of the stomach].
Maruyama K; Sasako M; Sano T; Katai H; Kinoshita T; Fukagawa T
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1998 Sep; 25(11):1793-9. PubMed ID: 9757210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimum number of lymph nodes that should be examined for the International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification of gastric carcinoma.
Ichikura T; Ogawa T; Chochi K; Kawabata T; Sugasawa H; Mochizuki H
World J Surg; 2003 Mar; 27(3):330-3. PubMed ID: 12607061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer: comparison of Union International Contra Cancer and Japanese systems.
Ikeguchi M; Murakami D; Kanaji S; Ohro S; Maeta Y; Yamaguchi K; Tatebe S; Kondo A; Tsujitani S; Kaibara N
ANZ J Surg; 2004 Oct; 74(10):852-4. PubMed ID: 15456431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Classification of regional lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma. German Gastric Cancer Study Group.
Roder JD; Böttcher K; Busch R; Wittekind C; Hermanek P; Siewert JR
Cancer; 1998 Feb; 82(4):621-31. PubMed ID: 9477092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes: is UICC/TNM node classification perfectly suitable for early gastric cancer?
Huang B; Zheng X; Wang Z; Wang M; Dong Y; Zhao B; Xu H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 18998065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Problems in the N-classification of the new 1997 UICC TNM stage classification for gastric cancer: an analysis of over 10 years' outcome of Japanese patients.
Nio Y; Yamasawa K; Yamaguchi K; Itakura M; Omori H; Koike M; Kitamura Y; Tsuji M; Endo S; Ogo Y; Yano S; Sumi S
Anticancer Res; 2003; 23(1B):697-705. PubMed ID: 12680170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of survival in gastric carcinoma related to lymph node grading by the new American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union International Contre le Cancer System or the Japanese system.
Celen O; Yildirim E; Gülben K; Berberoğlu U
Eur J Surg Suppl; 2003 Jul; (588):33-9. PubMed ID: 15200041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Superiority of a new UICC-TNM staging system for gastric carcinoma.
Hayashi H; Ochiai T; Suzuki T; Shimada H; Hori S; Takeda A; Miyazawa Y
Surgery; 2000 Feb; 127(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 10686976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system.
Fujii K; Isozaki H; Okajima K; Nomura E; Niki M; Sako S; Izumi N; Mabuchi H; Nishiguchi K; Tanigawa N
Br J Surg; 1999 May; 86(5):685-9. PubMed ID: 10361195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative effect of lymph node metastasis classified by the anatomical site or by the number of nodes involved on prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.
Hidaka H; Eto T; Maehara N; Jimi S; Hotokezaka M; Chijiiwa K
Hepatogastroenterology; 2008; 55(88):2269-72. PubMed ID: 19260520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lymph node metastases in gastric cancer: correlation between new and old UICC TNM classification.
Omejc M; Juvan R; Jelenc F; Repse S
Int Surg; 2001; 86(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 11890334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the New International Union Against Cancer TNM staging for gastric carcinoma.
Katai H; Yoshimura K; Maruyama K; Sasako M; Sano T
Cancer; 2000 Apr; 88(8):1796-800. PubMed ID: 10760754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio in T3 gastric cancer.
Hyung WJ; Noh SH; Yoo CH; Huh JH; Shin DW; Lah KH; Lee JH; Choi SH; Min JS
World J Surg; 2002 Mar; 26(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 11865369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic value of lymph node staging in gastric cancer.
Ichikawa D; Kurioka H; Ueshima Y; Shirono K; Kan K; Shioaki Y; Lee CJ; Hamashima T; Deguchi E; Ikeda E; Mutoh F; Yamagishi H
Hepatogastroenterology; 2003; 50(49):301-4. PubMed ID: 12630046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the prognostic significance between the number of metastatic lymph nodes and nodal stage in gastric carcinoma.
Kato M; Saji S; Kawaguchi Y; Kunieda K; Sugiyama Y; Takagi Y; Hiraoka T; Kumazawa I; Adachi T
Hepatogastroenterology; 1999; 46(30):3281-6. PubMed ID: 10626202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the seventh American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Classification of gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with the sixth classification.
Ahn HS; Lee HJ; Hahn S; Kim WH; Lee KU; Sano T; Edge SB; Yang HK
Cancer; 2010 Dec; 116(24):5592-8. PubMed ID: 20737569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reappraisal of the new UICC staging system for gastric cancer: problem in lymph node stage.
Lee WJ; Hong RL; Lai IR; Chen CN; Lee PH; Chung KC
Hepatogastroenterology; 2002; 49(45):860-4. PubMed ID: 12064008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Improvement of Japanese general rules and the TNM classification of stomach cancer--a proposal for a new stage-grouping].
Maruyama K; Miwa K; Kinoshita T
Gan No Rinsho; 1986 Aug; 32(10):1357-61. PubMed ID: 3783967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The study of the minimum number of examined lymph nodes for the TNM classification of gastric cancer].
Chen B; Sun JY; Jin F; Xu HM; Wang SB
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Jun; 43(11):702-5. PubMed ID: 16008956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Relationship between metastatic rate and amount of lymph nodes and prognosis of gastric cancer].
Li K; Xu HM; Chen JQ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Aug; 85(30):2113-6. PubMed ID: 16313820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
