These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9757232)

  • 41. Orthotopic liver transplantation: evaluation with MR cholangiography.
    Fulcher AS; Turner MA
    Radiology; 1999 Jun; 211(3):715-22. PubMed ID: 10352596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Vascular and extravascular complications of liver transplantation: comprehensive evaluation with three-dimensional contrast-enhanced volumetric MR imaging and MR cholangiopancreatography.
    Pandharipande PV; Lee VS; Morgan GR; Teperman LW; Krinsky GA; Rofsky NM; Roy MC; Weinreb JC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):1101-7. PubMed ID: 11641180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Value of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the preoperative diagnosis of common bile duct stones.
    Laokpessi A; Bouillet P; Sautereau D; Cessot F; Desport JC; Le Sidaner A; Pillegand B
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Aug; 96(8):2354-9. PubMed ID: 11513174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method.
    Zidi SH; Prat F; Le Guen O; Rondeau Y; Rocher L; Fritsch J; Choury AD; Pelletier G
    Gut; 1999 Jan; 44(1):118-22. PubMed ID: 9862837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [MR cholangiopancreatography using an open low field system of 0.2 tesla: early clinical results compared with a high field system (1.5 tesla) and ERCP].
    Wacker F; Branding G; Zimmer T; Faiss S; Wolf KJ
    Rofo; 1997 Dec; 167(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 9465952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Sensitivity of ultrasonography in the demonstration of common bile duct stones and its ranking in comparison with intravenous cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
    Myllylä V; Päivänsalo M; Pyhtinen J; Kairaluoma MI; Niemelä S
    Rofo; 1984 Aug; 141(2):192-4. PubMed ID: 6431543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of 3-dimensional turbo spin echo and single-shot turbo spin echo with ERCP.
    Chen RC; Lin KY; Lii JM; Yang MT; Chen WT; Tu HY; Wang CS
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2003 Mar; 102(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 12783134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Diagnostic possibilities of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography].
    Granov AM; Tiutin LA; Berezin SM
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1999; (4):42-5. PubMed ID: 11082691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
    Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Relative merits of ultrasonography, computed tomography and cholangiography in patients of surgical obstructive jaundice.
    Kumar M; Prashad R; Kumar A; Sharma R; Acharya SK; Chattopadhyay TK
    Hepatogastroenterology; 1998; 45(24):2027-32. PubMed ID: 9951858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. MR cholangiography in orthotopic liver transplantation: sensitivity and specificity in detecting biliary complications.
    Boraschi P; Donati F; Gigoni R; Volpi A; Salemi S; Filipponi F; Falaschi F
    Clin Transplant; 2010; 24(4):E82-7. PubMed ID: 20041910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Using kinematic MR cholangiopancreatography to evaluate biliary dilatation.
    Kim JH; Kim MJ; Park SI; Chung JJ; Song SY; Yoo HS; Lee JT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Apr; 178(4):909-14. PubMed ID: 11906871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. In vitro and clinical studies of image acquisition in breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography: single-shot projection technique versus multislice technique.
    Yamashita Y; Abe Y; Tang Y; Urata J; Sumi S; Takahashi M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jun; 168(6):1449-54. PubMed ID: 9168706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Role of MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with failed or inadequate ERCP.
    Varghese JC; Farrell MA; Courtney G; Osborne H; Murray FE; Lee MJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1527-33. PubMed ID: 10584796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Evaluation of the pancreas: a comparison of single thick-slice MR cholangiopancreatography with multiple thin-slice volume reconstruction MR cholangiopancreatography.
    Masui T; Takehara Y; Ichijo K; Naito M; Watahiki H; Kaneko M; Nozaki A; Sun Y
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1519-26. PubMed ID: 10584795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Breath-hold MR cholangiography with snapshot techniques: prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.
    Holzknecht N; Gauger J; Sackmann M; Thoeni RF; Schurig J; Holl J; Weinzierl M; Helmberger T; Paumgartner G; Reiser M
    Radiology; 1998 Mar; 206(3):657-64. PubMed ID: 9494483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [2D-FASE MRCP for pediatrics with congenital biliary dilatation: usefulness of non-breath-hold one-shot MRCP].
    Kuwatsuru R; Yamataka A; Irimoto M; Minowa O; Makita J; Kassai Y; Miyano T; Katayama H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Dec; 58(14):807-10. PubMed ID: 10028832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. MR cholangiography in the examination of patients with biliary-enteric anastomoses.
    Pavone P; Laghi A; Catalano C; Broglia L; Panebianco V; Messina A; Salvatori FM; Passariello R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Sep; 169(3):807-11. PubMed ID: 9275901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Diagnosing bile duct stones: comparison of unenhanced helical CT, oral contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography, and MR cholangiography.
    Soto JA; Alvarez O; Múnera F; Velez SM; Valencia J; Ramírez N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1127-34. PubMed ID: 11000177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Extrahepatic biliary diseases: 3D MR cholangiopancreatography compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
    Lee MG; Lee HJ; Kim MH; Kang EM; Kim YH; Lee SG; Kim PN; Ha HK; Auh YH
    Radiology; 1997 Mar; 202(3):663-9. PubMed ID: 9051013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.