239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9757292)
21. Improving the sensitivity of stereotactic core biopsy to diagnose ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a mathematical model.
Coombs NJ; Laddie JR; Royle GT; Rubin CM; Briley MS
Br J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 74(878):123-6. PubMed ID: 11718382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Lobular neoplasia at 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy: correlation with surgical excisional biopsy and mammographic follow-up.
Mahoney MC; Robinson-Smith TM; Shaughnessy EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Oct; 187(4):949-54. PubMed ID: 16985141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Breast MRI wire-guided excisional biopsy: specimen size as compared to mammogram wire-guided excisional biopsy and implications for use.
Javid SH; Carlson JW; Garber JE; Birdwell RL; Lester S; Lipsitz S; Golshan M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Dec; 14(12):3352-8. PubMed ID: 17849165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features.
Stomper PC; Herman S; Klippenstein DL; Winston JS; Edge SB; Arredondo MA; Mazurchuk RV; Blumenson LE
Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):387-95. PubMed ID: 7480682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The advanced breast biopsy instrumentation (ABBI) experience at a community hospital.
Sheth D; Wesen CA; Schroder D; Boccaccio JE; Lloyd LR
Am Surg; 1999 Aug; 65(8):726-9; discussion 729-30. PubMed ID: 10432081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Orel SG; Mendonca MH; Reynolds C; Schnall MD; Solin LJ; Sullivan DC
Radiology; 1997 Feb; 202(2):413-20. PubMed ID: 9015067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Contrast-enhanced MR-mammography in a pregnant woman with breast carcinoma].
Hauth E; Umutlu L; Forsting M
Rofo; 2007 Oct; 179(10):1083-4. PubMed ID: 17879180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The value of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and size assessment of in situ and small invasive breast carcinoma.
Schouten van der Velden AP; Boetes C; Bult P; Wobbes T
Am J Surg; 2006 Aug; 192(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 16860625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Breast carcinoma in situ in 167 women--incidence, mode of presentation, therapy and follow-up.
Ringberg A; Andersson I; Aspegren K; Linell F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1991 Oct; 17(5):466-76. PubMed ID: 1657650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An update on core needle biopsy for radiologically detected breast lesions.
Nguyen M; McCombs MM; Ghandehari S; Kim A; Wang H; Barsky SH; Love S; Bassett LW
Cancer; 1996 Dec; 78(11):2340-5. PubMed ID: 8941004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions: an indication for surgical biopsy.
Liberman L; Cohen MA; Dershaw DD; Abramson AF; Hann LE; Rosen PP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1111-3. PubMed ID: 7717215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic MR-mammography at 1.5 T].
Fischer U; Westerhof JP; Brinck U; Korabiowska M; Schauer A; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1996 Apr; 164(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 8645861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Magnification views of mammography decrease biopsy rates.
Madan AK; Nguyen MT; Wakabayashi MN; Beech DJ
Am Surg; 2001 Jul; 67(7):687-9. PubMed ID: 11450790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast. Its diagnostic imaging and the role of percutaneous needle biopsy with a 14-gauge needle].
Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; di Loreto C; Puglisi F; Vasciaveo A
Radiol Med; 1999 Sep; 98(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 10575441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Imaging findings of papillary breast lesions: a pictorial review.
Kestelman FP; Gomes CF; Fontes FB; Marchiori E
Clin Radiol; 2014 Apr; 69(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 24457016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The value of dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI in mammographically detected BI-RADS 5 microcalcifications.
Houserkova D; Prasad SN; Svach I; Kucerova L; Duskova M; Bucil J; Sisola I; Zlamalova N; Svebisova H
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2008 Jun; 152(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 18795084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Potential role of magnetic resonance imaging and other modalities in ductal carcinoma in situ detection.
Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; Daniel BL
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2001 May; 9(2):345-56, vii. PubMed ID: 11493424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation.
Holland R; Hendriks JH
Semin Diagn Pathol; 1994 Aug; 11(3):181-92. PubMed ID: 7831529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Radiographic features for triple negative ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Kojima Y; Tsunoda H; Honda S; Kikuchi M; Kawauchi N; Yoshida A; Yagata H; Yamauchi H; Suzuki K
Breast Cancer; 2011 Jul; 18(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 21465228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
