227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9757579)
1. Functional analysis and treatment of destructive behavior maintained by termination of "don't" (and symmetrical "do") requests.
Fisher WW; Adelinis JD; Thompson RH; Worsdell AS; Zarcone JR
J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(3):339-56. PubMed ID: 9757579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of symmetrical "do" and "don't" requests to interrupt ongoing activities.
Adelinis JD; Hagopian LP
J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):519-23. PubMed ID: 10641305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of the properties of attention as reinforcement for destructive and appropriate behavior.
Piazza CC; Bowman LG; Contrucci SA; Delia MD; Adelinis JD; Goh HL
J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):437-49. PubMed ID: 10641299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The evaluation and treatment of aggression maintained by attention and automatic reinforcement.
Thompson RH; Fisher WW; Piazza CC; Kuhn DE
J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(1):103-16. PubMed ID: 9532754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An experimental analysis of aggression.
Marcus BA; Vollmer TR; Swanson V; Roane HR; Ringdahl JE
Behav Modif; 2001 Apr; 25(2):189-213. PubMed ID: 11317634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Decreasing excessive functional communication responses while treating destructive behavior using response restriction.
Fisher WW; Greer BD; Querim AC; DeRosa N
Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2614-23. PubMed ID: 25036315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The class specific effects of compliance training with "do" and "don't" requests: analogue analysis and classroom application.
Neef NA; Shafer MS; Egel AL; Cataldo MF; Parrish JM
J Appl Behav Anal; 1983; 16(1):81-99. PubMed ID: 6187723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On the reinforcing effects of the content of verbal attention.
Fisher WW; Ninness HA; Piazza CC; Owen-DeSchryver JS
J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):235-8. PubMed ID: 8682738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Facilitating tolerance of delayed reinforcement during functional communication training.
Fisher WW; Thompson RH; Hagopian LP; Bowman LG; Krug A
Behav Modif; 2000 Jan; 24(1):3-29. PubMed ID: 10641365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Positive reinforcement as treatment for problem behavior maintained by negative reinforcement.
Payne SW; Dozier CL
J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(3):699-703. PubMed ID: 24114236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nondirective prompting and noncontingent reinforcement in the treatment of destructive behavior during hygiene routines.
Piazza CC; Contrucci SA; Hanley GP; Fisher WW
J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(4):705-8. PubMed ID: 9433795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the establishing and reinforcing effects of termination of demands for destructive behavior maintained by positive and negative reinforcement.
Piazza CC; Hanley GP; Fisher WW; Ruyter JM; Gulotta CS
Res Dev Disabil; 1998; 19(5):395-407. PubMed ID: 9770252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Further analysis of problem behavior in response class hierarchies.
Richman DM; Wacker DP; Asmus JM; Casey SD; Andelman M
J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(3):269-83. PubMed ID: 10513024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of consequence manipulation during functional analysis of problem behavior maintained by negative reinforcement.
Potoczak K; Carr JE; Michael J
J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(4):719-24. PubMed ID: 18189106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Functional communication training in the treatment of problem behavior maintained by access to rituals.
Rispoli M; Camargo S; Machalicek W; Lang R; Sigafoos J
J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(3):580-93. PubMed ID: 24817482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the relation of mands and the function of destructive behavior.
Bowman LG; Fisher WW; Thompson RH; Piazza CC
J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(2):251-64; quiz 264-5. PubMed ID: 9210305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Advances in the indirect, descriptive, and experimental approaches to the functional analysis of problem behavior.
Wightman J; Julio F; Virués-Ortega J
Psicothema; 2014 May; 26(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 24755019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of contingency strength and response suppression.
Borrero JC; Vollmer TR; Wright CS
J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 12555906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Further investigation of differential reinforcement of alternative behavior without extinction for escape-maintained destructive behavior.
Briggs AM; Dozier CL; Lessor AN; Kamana BU; Jess RL
J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 Oct; 52(4):956-973. PubMed ID: 31642525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of noncontingent delivery of high- and low-preference stimuli on attention-maintained destructive behavior.
Fisher WW; O'Connor JT; Kurtz PF; DeLeon IG; Gotjen DL
J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 10738954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
