143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9757881)
1. Systemic methotrexate therapy versus laparoscopic salpingostomy in patients with tubal pregnancy. Part I. Impact on patients' health-related quality of life.
Nieuwkerk PT; Hajenius PJ; Ankum WM; Van der Veen F; Wijker W; Bossuyt PM
Fertil Steril; 1998 Sep; 70(3):511-7. PubMed ID: 9757881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systemic methotrexate therapy versus laparoscopic salpingostomy in tubal pregnancy. Part II. Patient preferences for systemic methotrexate.
Nieuwkerk PT; Hajenius PJ; Van der Veen F; Ankum WM; Wijker W; Bossuyt PM
Fertil Steril; 1998 Sep; 70(3):518-22. PubMed ID: 9757882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomised trial of systemic methotrexate versus laparoscopic salpingostomy in tubal pregnancy.
Hajenius PJ; Engelsbel S; Mol BW; Van der Veen F; Ankum WM; Bossuyt PM; Hemrika DJ; Lammes FB
Lancet; 1997 Sep; 350(9080):774-9. PubMed ID: 9297998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment of tubal pregnancy in the netherlands: an economic comparison of systemic methotrexate administration and laparoscopic salpingostomy.
Mol BW; Hajenius PJ; Engelsbel S; Ankum WM; Hemrika DJ; Van der Veen F; Bossuyt PM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Oct; 181(4):945-51. PubMed ID: 10521759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy.
Hajenius PJ; Mol F; Mol BW; Bossuyt PM; Ankum WM; van der Veen F
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jan; 2007(1):CD000324. PubMed ID: 17253448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomised trial comparing single dose systemic methotrexate and laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of unruptured tubal pregnancy.
Sowter MC; Farquhar CM; Petrie KJ; Gudex G
BJOG; 2001 Feb; 108(2):192-203. PubMed ID: 11236120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of local injection of methotrexate and linear salpingostomy in the conservative laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy.
Porpora MG; Oliva MM; De Cristofaro A; Montanino G; Cosmi EV
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1996 Feb; 3(2):271-6. PubMed ID: 9050639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy.
Hajenius PJ; Mol BW; Bossuyt PM; Ankum WM; Van Der Veen F
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000324. PubMed ID: 10796710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fertility outcome after systemic methotrexate and laparoscopic salpingostomy for tubal pregnancy.
Dias Pereira G; Hajenius PJ; Mol BW; Ankum WM; Hemrika DJ; Bossuyt PM; van der Veen F
Lancet; 1999 Feb; 353(9154):724-5. PubMed ID: 10073522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fertility outcome following combined methotrexate treatment of unruptured extrauterine pregnancy.
Debby A; Golan A; Sadan O; Zakut H; Glezerman M
BJOG; 2000 May; 107(5):626-30. PubMed ID: 10826577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic salpingostomy versus laparoscopic local methotrexate injection in the management of unruptured ectopic gestation.
Zilber U; Pansky M; Bukovsky I; Golan A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Sep; 175(3 Pt 1):600-2. PubMed ID: 8828420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Disparities in the management of ectopic pregnancy.
Hsu JY; Chen L; Gumer AR; Tergas AI; Hou JY; Burke WM; Ananth CV; Hershman DL; Wright JD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):49.e1-49.e10. PubMed ID: 28288792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Success and spontaneous pregnancy rates following systemic methotrexate versus laparoscopic surgery for tubal pregnancies: a randomized trial.
Krag Moeller LB; Moeller C; Thomsen SG; Andersen LF; Lundvall L; Lidegaard Ø; Kjer JJ; Ingemanssen JL; Zobbe V; Floridon C; Petersen J; Ottesen B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(12):1331-7. PubMed ID: 19961341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methotrexate as a possible cause of ovarian cysts formation: experience with women treated for ectopic pregnancies.
Ben-Shlomo I; Eliyahu S; Yanai N; Shalev E
Fertil Steril; 1997 Apr; 67(4):786-8. PubMed ID: 9093213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prophylactic methotrexate after linear salpingostomy: a decision analysis.
Gracia CR; Brown HA; Barnhart KT
Fertil Steril; 2001 Dec; 76(6):1191-5. PubMed ID: 11730749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Successful drug therapy of persistent ectopic pregnancy after tube-saving operation].
Riederer M; Gulik L
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 Jul; 54(7):423-5. PubMed ID: 7926578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ectopic pregnancy; risk factors and comparison of intervention success rates in tubal ectopic pregnancy.
Kazandi M; Turan V
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2011; 38(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 21485731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fertility outcomes subsequent to treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy in younger Turkish women.
Turan V
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 24(5):251-5. PubMed ID: 21715197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Controversies and problems in the current management of tubal pregnancy.
Maymon R; Shulman A
Hum Reprod Update; 1996; 2(6):541-51. PubMed ID: 9111187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Hysteroscopically assisted laparoscopic salpingostomy in the treatment of tubal pregnancy].
Zaremba R; Mára M; Razak I; Vlášek V
Ceska Gynekol; 2018; 83(1):50-52. PubMed ID: 29510640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
