189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 975799)
21. Pennhurst, Romeo, and Rogers. The Burger Court and Mental Health Law Reform Litigation.
Brant J
J Leg Med; 1983 Sep; 4(3):323-48. PubMed ID: 6605401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Rights of the mentally handicapped: which way in the 1980s?
Friedman PR
Trial; 1981 Feb; 17(2):43-46, 60-61. PubMed ID: 11651746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Act 817 of 1979: Arkansas' new involuntary commitment law.
Faulkner LR
J Ark Med Soc; 1980 Apr; 76(11):457-63. PubMed ID: 6445353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst.
Ferleger D; Scott PM
West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):327-61. PubMed ID: 11658602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Therapeutic jurisprudence and the civil rights of institutionalized mentally disabled persons: hopeless oxymoron or path to redemption?
Perlin ML; Gould KK; Dorfman DA
Psychol Public Policy Law; 1995 Mar; 1(1):80-119. PubMed ID: 12803207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Involuntary commitment: the move toward dangerousness.
Weissbourd R
John Marshall Law Rev; 1982; 15(1):83-113. PubMed ID: 11658335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Patients' rights and the psychiatrist's dilemma.
Kopolow LE
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1976; 4(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 1027500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. At law. One flew over the Supreme Court.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 1973926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. More positive supreme court views on psychiatry.
Kennelly DJ
Am J Psychiatry; 1985 Mar; 142(3):387-8. PubMed ID: 3970284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The hostility of the burger court to mental health law reform litigation.
Brant J
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1983; 11(1):77-90. PubMed ID: 6850110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
Belzer I
UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Constitutional law--right to liberty--involuntary confinement of mental patients.
Tenn Law Rev; 1976; 43(2):366-73. PubMed ID: 11664691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
Cort RS
UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Psychiatric care and the law of substitute decision-making.
Parry J
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1987; 11(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 11658868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Constitutional law--Fourteenth Amendment--due process--civil commitment--mentally ill and retarded juveniles.
Arena RM
Duquesne Law Rev; 1980; 18(4):969-82. PubMed ID: 11658429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Involuntary civil commitment in Ontario: the need to curtail the abuses of psychiatry.
Anand R
Can Bar Rev; 1979 Jun; 57(2):250-80. PubMed ID: 11658494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Institutionalization, deinstitutionalization and the adversary process.
Bazelon DL
Columbia Law Rev; 1975 Jun; 75(5):897-912. PubMed ID: 1235495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The Supreme Court looks at psychiatry.
Appelbaum PS
Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Jul; 141(7):827-35. PubMed ID: 6731630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Civil commitment of mentally ill--right to treatment--parens patriae power--right to liberty.
Cooper GG
Akron Law Rev; 1975; 9(2):374-82. PubMed ID: 11664558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
Parry J
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
