These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 975799)

  • 41. If civil commitment is the answer for children, what are the questions?
    Zenoff EH; Zients AB
    George Washington Law Rev; 1983 Jan; 51(2):171-218. PubMed ID: 11658670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The law and the mentally incompetent.
    Leahy ML; Barnes M
    Public Welf; 1978; 36(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 10294858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A review of major implications of the O'Connor v. Donaldson decision.
    Kopolow LE
    Am J Psychiatry; 1976 Apr; 133(4):379-83. PubMed ID: 1267034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The role of Addington v. Texas on involuntary civil commitment.
    Hays JR
    Psychol Rep; 1981 Dec; 65(3 pt. 2):1211-5. PubMed ID: 11659310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Constitutional law--due process--involuntarily civilly committed mental patients have a constitutional right to treatment.
    Johnson RM; Wehrle-Einhorn RJ
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1974; 23(1):188-205. PubMed ID: 11664536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The Supreme Court and madness: a middle ground on proof of mental illness for commitment.
    Curran WJ
    N Engl J Med; 1979 Aug; 301(6):317-8. PubMed ID: 450018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. o'Connor v. Donaldson: a right to liberty for the nondangerous mentally ill.
    Muller MJ
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1975; 3(2):550-62. PubMed ID: 11664550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The right to refuse treatment and the abolition of involuntary hospitalization of the mentally ill.
    Tanay E
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1980; 8(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 7225582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Warren Burger and the civil commitment tetralogy.
    Shuman D
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1980; 3(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 7002809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Legal conceptualizations, legal fictions, and the manipulation of reality: conflict between models of decision making in psychiatry and law.
    Gutheil TG; Mills MJ
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 6128038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The role of the court as mental health laws change.
    Flaschner FN
    Ill Bar J; 1973 Nov; 62(3):128-35. PubMed ID: 11664277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The importance of establishing competence in cases involving the involuntary administration of psychotropic medications.
    Knepper K
    Law Psychol Rev; 1996; 20():97-137. PubMed ID: 11656625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.
    Klein DW
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications.
    Parry JW
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. In search of a sane commitment statute.
    Treffert DA; Krajeck RW
    Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):56-57+. PubMed ID: 11662296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Current status of institutionalized mental health patients' right to refuse psychotropic drugs.
    Kemna DJ
    J Leg Med; 1985 Mar; 6(1):107-38. PubMed ID: 2860193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. o'Connor v. Donaldson: due process rights of mental patients in state hospitals.
    Anderson K
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1976; 6(1):65-82. PubMed ID: 11664777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Constitutional law--the rights of involuntarily committed mentally retarded persons under the Fourteenth Amendment: Youngberg v. Romeo.
    Smith GG
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):451-66. PubMed ID: 12083080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The Tarasoff decisions: suing psychotherapists to safeguard society.
    Stone AA
    Harv Law Rev; 1976 Dec; 90(2):358-78. PubMed ID: 1028678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The right to treatment case--that wasn't.
    Mancilla J
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1976; 30(2):486-98. PubMed ID: 11664663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.