These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 975799)
101. Patuxent and discretion in the criminal justice system. Hoff BH Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1977; 5(2):144-60. PubMed ID: 588750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
102. The American Psychiatric Association position statement on involuntary hospitalization of the mentally ill (revised). Am J Psychiatry; 1973 Mar; 130(3):392. PubMed ID: 4688621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
103. [Commitment of mentally ill against their own wish; a contribution to psychiatric legislation]. HINSEN Offentl Gesundheitsdienst; 1950 Nov; 12(8):284-93. PubMed ID: 14827468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
104. In defence of compulsory psychiatric intervention. Clare AW Lancet; 1978 Jun; 1(8075):1197-8. PubMed ID: 77956 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
105. Internees in Poland: psychiatric abuse claim. Rich V Nature; 1982 Sep; 299(5882):386. PubMed ID: 11643799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
106. Foucault, forensic psychiatry, and the first involuntary commitment. Aggarwal NK J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(4):594-6. PubMed ID: 21156924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
108. Psychiatric abuse and legal reform: two ways to make a bad situation worse. Stone AA Int J Law Psychiatry; 1982; 5(1):9-28. PubMed ID: 7107113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
109. The process of criminal commitment for pretrial psychiatric examination: an evaluation. Geller JL; Lister ED Am J Psychiatry; 1978 Feb; 135(2):256. PubMed ID: 623349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
111. Deinstitutionalization of the mentally ill. N Engl J Med; 1981 Dec; 305(24):1477. PubMed ID: 7300870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
112. EU deplores US execution of mentally ill prisoner. McLellan F Lancet; 2004 Jan; 363(9404):220. PubMed ID: 14746320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
113. Psychiatrists win a round in the right to refuse treatment controversy. Freishtat HW J Clin Psychopharmacol; 1981 Mar; 1(2):101-3. PubMed ID: 7298882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
114. Kremens v. Bartley: the case for the state. Watkins NJ; Roth BA Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1976 Oct; 27(10):706-8. PubMed ID: 976952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
116. Ben-Ari v. Shapira: contempt proceedings against mentally ill persons in the Supreme Court of Israel Civil Appeal. Levi J Med Law; 1985; 4(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 4038539 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
117. Hanging the psychiatrists. Stone AA Am Bar Assoc J; 1976 Jun; 62():773-4. PubMed ID: 11665054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
118. Heading for Honolulu. Rich V Nature; 1977 Aug; 268(5621):578-9. PubMed ID: 11643397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
119. The interdependence of science and law. Breyer S Science; 1998 Apr; 280(5363):537-8. PubMed ID: 9575098 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
120. US Supreme Court may have to settle dispute over patenting DNA sequences. Dyer C BMJ; 2011 Sep; 343():d6187. PubMed ID: 21952463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]