These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9758029)

  • 1. Surrogates' agreement with patients' resuscitation preferences: effect of age, relationship, and SUPPORT intervention. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.
    Marbella AM; Desbiens NA; Mueller-Rizner N; Layde PM
    J Crit Care; 1998 Sep; 13(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 9758029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advance directives for seriously ill hospitalized patients: effectiveness with the patient self-determination act and the SUPPORT intervention. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.
    Teno J; Lynn J; Wenger N; Phillips RS; Murphy DP; Connors AF; Desbiens N; Fulkerson W; Bellamy P; Knaus WA
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Apr; 45(4):500-7. PubMed ID: 9100721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: findings of the SUPPORT project. The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.
    Covinsky KE; Fuller JD; Yaffe K; Johnston CB; Hamel MB; Lynn J; Teno JM; Phillips RS
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 May; 48(S1):S187-93. PubMed ID: 10809474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators.
    JAMA; 1995 Nov 22-29; 274(20):1591-8. PubMed ID: 7474243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The illusion of end-of-life resource savings with advance directives. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.
    Teno J; Lynn J; Connors AF; Wenger N; Phillips RS; Alzola C; Murphy DP; Desbiens N; Knaus WA
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Apr; 45(4):513-8. PubMed ID: 9100723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Description of the SUPPORT intervention. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.
    Murphy P; Kreling B; Kathryn E; Stevens M; Lynn J; Dulac J
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 May; 48(S1):S154-61. PubMed ID: 10809469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surrogates' predictions of seriously ill patients' resuscitation preferences.
    Layde PM; Beam CA; Broste SK; Connors AF; Desbiens N; Lynn J; Phillips RS; Reding D; Teno J; Vidaillet H
    Arch Fam Med; 1995 Jun; 4(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 7773427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of life-story narrative for end-of-life surrogate's decision-making is inadequate: a Q-methodology study.
    Hammami MM; Abuhdeeb K; Hammami MB; De Padua SJS; Al-Balkhi A
    BMC Med Ethics; 2019 May; 20(1):28. PubMed ID: 31053127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors associated with do-not-resuscitate orders: patients' preferences, prognoses, and physicians' judgments. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.
    Hakim RB; Teno JM; Harrell FE; Knaus WA; Wenger N; Phillips RS; Layde P; Califf R; Connors AF; Lynn J
    Ann Intern Med; 1996 Aug; 125(4):284-93. PubMed ID: 8678391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient preferences for communication with physicians about end-of-life decisions. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preference for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.
    Hofmann JC; Wenger NS; Davis RB; Teno J; Connors AF; Desbiens N; Lynn J; Phillips RS
    Ann Intern Med; 1997 Jul; 127(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 9214246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of emotion and physician communication behaviors on surrogates' life-sustaining treatment decisions: a randomized simulation experiment.
    Barnato AE; Arnold RM
    Crit Care Med; 2013 Jul; 41(7):1686-91. PubMed ID: 23660727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving advance care planning by accommodating family preferences.
    Hines SC; Glover JJ; Babrow AS; Holley JL; Badzek LA; Moss AH
    J Palliat Med; 2001; 4(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 11798480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "It's not just what the doctor tells me:" factors that influence surrogate decision-makers' perceptions of prognosis.
    Boyd EA; Lo B; Evans LR; Malvar G; Apatira L; Luce JM; White DB
    Crit Care Med; 2010 May; 38(5):1270-5. PubMed ID: 20228686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Choices of seriously ill patients about cardiopulmonary resuscitation: correlates and outcomes. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.
    Phillips RS; Wenger NS; Teno J; Oye RK; Youngner S; Califf R; Layde P; Desbiens N; Connors AF; Lynn J
    Am J Med; 1996 Feb; 100(2):128-37. PubMed ID: 8629646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is experience a good teacher? How interns and attending physicians understand patients' choices for end-of-life care. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.
    Wilson IB; Green ML; Goldman L; Tsevat J; Cook EF; Phillips RS
    Med Decis Making; 1997; 17(2):217-27. PubMed ID: 9107618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patients who want their family and physician to make resuscitation decisions for them: observations from SUPPORT and HELP. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Hospitalized Elderly Longitudinal Project.
    Puchalski CM; Zhong Z; Jacobs MM; Fox E; Lynn J; Harrold J; Galanos A; Phillips RS; Califf R; Teno JM
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 May; 48(S1):S84-90. PubMed ID: 10809461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age-related differences in care preferences, treatment decisions, and clinical outcomes of seriously ill hospitalized adults: lessons from SUPPORT.
    Hamel MB; Lynn J; Teno JM; Covinsky KE; Wu AW; Galanos A; Desbiens NA; Phillips RS
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 May; 48(S1):S176-82. PubMed ID: 10809472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prevalence of and Factors Related to Discordance About Prognosis Between Physicians and Surrogate Decision Makers of Critically Ill Patients.
    White DB; Ernecoff N; Buddadhumaruk P; Hong S; Weissfeld L; Curtis JR; Luce JM; Lo B
    JAMA; 2016 May; 315(19):2086-94. PubMed ID: 27187301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How Surrogates Decide: A Secondary Data Analysis of Decision-Making Principles Used by the Surrogates of Hospitalized Older Adults.
    Devnani R; Slaven JE; Bosslet GT; Montz K; Inger L; Burke ES; Torke AM
    J Gen Intern Med; 2017 Dec; 32(12):1285-1293. PubMed ID: 28840485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acutely Bereaved Surrogates' Stories About the Decision to Limit Life Support in the ICU.
    Nunez ER; Schenker Y; Joel ID; Reynolds CF; Dew MA; Arnold RM; Barnato AE
    Crit Care Med; 2015 Nov; 43(11):2387-93. PubMed ID: 26327201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.