These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 975812)
1. Loop vs. shield: a competing risks analysis of IUD termination. Herson J; Crocker CL; Butts E Contraception; 1976 Jul; 14(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 975812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Clinical study of a copper IUD, T Cu 200]. Viollet MF; Cohen J; Merger R Gynecologie; 1975 Jan; 26(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 1095434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. One-year evaluation of the Spring Coil IUD in Rijeka, Yugoslavia, and Cairo, Egypt. Randic L; Ragab I; Thomas M; Kessel E; Bernard RP Adv Plan Parent; 1975; 10(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 1234074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Who will find a perfect IUD? People; 1975; 2(4):33-4. PubMed ID: 1164965 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Risks of the IUD for young women]. Dukkers van Emden DM; van der Maas PJ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1984 Jul; 128(27):1272-6. PubMed ID: 6462275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The IUD after 20 years: a review. Hutchings JE; Benson PJ; Perkin GW; Soderstrom RM Fam Plann Perspect; 1985; 17(6):244-7, 250-5. PubMed ID: 3916184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Effectiveness of intrauterine contraceptives: the side effects and complications from their use]. Novilov IuI; Kononova ES Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1979 Jul; (7):46-7. PubMed ID: 484804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of the Dalkon shield in contraception. Ng AY; Chan T; Cheng MC; Hangchi D; Ratnam SS Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1975 Aug; 15(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 1065308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of echosonography in diagnosing IUD complications. Khomassuridze AG; Tsertsvadze GL Adv Contracept; 1990 Jun; 6(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 2206017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tatum T: experience with 3,000 patients. Williamson HO; Bank HL; Kirkland BH Adv Plan Parent; 1975; 10(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 789154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparative study of the acceptability of inert and copper-containing intrauterine contraceptive devices]. Manuilova IA; Dubnitskaia LV Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1988 Nov; (11):47-50. PubMed ID: 3239684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception. Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical experiences with the intrauterine device "Dana-Super". (Preliminary report)]. Steindel E; Hagen H Zentralbl Gynakol; 1970 Apr; 92(17):518-22. PubMed ID: 5513474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficiency and acceptability of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Trutko NS Acta Med Hung; 1986; 43(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 3588154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Complications associated with IUD use in a family practice setting. Lewis RD; Shank C J Fam Pract; 1979 Jan; 8(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 759549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]